Literature DB >> 4961263

Relationship between Rh-o(D) zygosity and red cell Rh-o(D) antigen content in family members.

S P Masouredis, M E Dupuy, M Elliot.   

Abstract

The red cells of 63 members of 11 families were tested with (125)I-labeled anti-Rh(0)(D). Families with a history of hemolytic disease of the newborn due to fetomaternal Rh incompatibility were selected for study. In such families it was possible to determine the antibody binding to the Rh(0)(D) heterozygous red cells of the children and to compare within each family this value with the antibody bound to the father's Rh(0)(D)-positive red cells and the mother's Rh(0)(D)-negative red cells. The fathers in all the families studied could be assigned to two classes on the basis of the quantity of antibody bound to their red cells. One group bound about the same quantity of antibody to their cells as did their children, indicating that they were heterozygous for the Rh(0)(D) antigen. The other bound about twice as much antibody to their cells as did their children, indicating that they were homozygous for the antigen. The Rh genotype of the father in all 11 families could be ascertained by using the children in each family as a reference point. The members of two families showed a poor correspondence between antibody binding and zygosity. In one family an Rh heterozygous child (R(1)r) took up 85% of the antibody bound to the father's homozygous cells (R(1)R(1)), and in the other family an Rh heterozygous child (R(1)r) took up 20% more antibody than did the cells of her father, which were of the same Rh phenotype (Rh(1)) and zygosity.The quantity of antibody bound to the red cells of unrelated Rh(0)(D) homozygous individuals of the same Rh phenotype (Rh(1)) showed an almost sixfold variation. A consequence of this observation was that the cells of Rh(0)(D) heterozygous children of high antibody uptake fathers took up more antibody than did the cells of low antibody uptake Rh(0)(D) homozygous fathers. The gene dosage effect for the Rh(0)(D) antigen demonstrable within a family does not appear to apply when unrelated individuals are tested, even though they may be of the same Rh phenotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1967        PMID: 4961263      PMCID: PMC297071          DOI: 10.1172/JCI105569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0021-9738            Impact factor:   14.808


  33 in total

1.  ATTEMPTS AT PREVENTION OF INTRAUTERINE DEATH IN ERYTHROBLASTOSIS FETALIS.

Authors:  F H ALLEN
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1963-12-19       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  STUDIES ON THE REACTION BETWEEN THE BLOOD-GROUP ANTIBODY ANTI-D AND ERYTHROCYTES.

Authors:  N C HUGHES-JONES; B GARDNER; R TELFORD
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1963-09       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  IMMUNOCHEMICAL STUDIES OF THE RH SYSTEM. 3. QUANTITATIVE HEMAGGLUTINATION THAT IS RELATIVELY INDEPENDENT OF SOURCE OF RH ANTIGENS AND ANTIBODIES.

Authors:  R E ROSENFIELD; I O SZYMANSKI; S KOCHWA
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1964

4.  RHESUS HAEMOLYTIC DISEASE OF THE NEWBORN AND THE ABO GROUPS.

Authors:  S MURRAY; E G KNOX; W WALKER
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  1965 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.144

5.  Studies on the dynamics of the reaction between Rh antibody and antigen.

Authors:  R S EVANS; W K MEBUST; M T HICKEY
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1960-10       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  High specific activity iodination of gamma-globulin with iodine-131 monochloride.

Authors:  R W HELMKAMP; R L GOODLAND; W F BALE; I L SPAR; L E MUTSCHLER
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1960-11       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Reaction of I-131 trace labeled human anti-Rho(D) with red cells.

Authors:  S P MASOUREDIS
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1959-02       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  A simple chromatographic method for preparation of gamma globulin.

Authors:  H B LEVY; H A SOBER
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1960-01

9.  THE EFFECT OF PH AND IONIC STRENGTH ON THE REACTION BETWEEN ANTI-D AND ERYTHROCYTES.

Authors:  N C HUGHES-JONES; B GARDNER; R TELFORD
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 7.397

10.  AN INTERACTION BETWEEN ALLELES AT THE RH LOCUS IN MAN WHICH WEAKENS THE REACTIVITY OF THE RH(0) FACTOR (D).

Authors:  R Ceppellini; L C Dunn; M Turri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1955-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  6 in total

1.  Binding characteristics of M and L isoantibodies to high and low potassium sheep red cells.

Authors:  P K Lauf; W W Sun
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1976-09-17       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  Ultrastructural mapping of methyldopa and anti-D IgG erythrocyte antigen receptors.

Authors:  S P Masouredis; E Sudora
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Exposure of the Rh0(D) antigen on the surface and cytoplasmic domains of the red cell membrane.

Authors:  J E Kleeman; S P Masouredis; E J Victoria
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  Quantitative two-dimensional ultrastructural distribution of Rh o (D) antigenic sites on human erythrocyte membranes.

Authors:  G L Nicolson; S P Masouredis; S J Singer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The role of antigen mobility in anti-Rh0(D)-induced agglutination.

Authors:  E J Victoria; E A Muchmore; E J Sudora; S P Masouredis
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Dosage effects for superoxide dismutase-1 in nucleated cells aneuploid for chromosome 21.

Authors:  W W Feaster; L W Kwok; C J Epstein
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 11.025

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.