Literature DB >> 488082

Perception of effort in isometric and dynamic muscular contraction.

D F Cooper, G Grimby, D A Jones, R H Edwards.   

Abstract

The perception of muscular effort was studied using estimation and production methods in the adductor pollicis and quadriceps. A psychometric scale (percentage magnitude) was used. Static contractions were studied in the adductor pollicis, and both dynamic (isokinetic) and static contractions were studied in quadriceps. Linear and logarithmic equations were fitted for the perceived effort as a percentage of the maximum in relation to the produced percentage maximal force or torque. The logarithmic exponent was around or above 1.0. No significant difference was found between mean exponent and intercept values for the adductor pollicis and the quadriceps, or when estimated or produced values for the two muscles were compared. There was no difference in the same subjects between the equations for static and dynamic contractions with low angular velocity of the quadriceps.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 488082     DOI: 10.1007/bf00430009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  9 in total

1.  Subjective scale of force for a large muscle group.

Authors:  H EISLER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-09

2.  Scales of apparent force.

Authors:  J C STEVENS; J D MACK
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

3.  Perception of effort during partial curarization [proceedings].

Authors:  E J Campbell; R H Edwards; D K Hill; D A Jones; M K Sykes
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Force-velocity relations and fiber composition in human knee extensor muscles.

Authors:  A Thorstensson; G Grimby; J Karlsson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 3.531

5.  Joint sense, muscle sense, and their combination as position sense, measured at the distal interphalangeal joint of the middle finger.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; D I McCloskey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Constant errors in the execution and appreciation of movement.

Authors:  R Granit
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress.

Authors:  G Borg
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1970

8.  Endurance time in static work during partial curarization.

Authors:  S Molbech; S H Johansen
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 3.531

9.  Human skeletal muscle function: description of tests and normal values.

Authors:  R H Edwards; A Young; G P Hosking; D A Jones
Journal:  Clin Sci Mol Med       Date:  1977-03
  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Perceived exertion and maximal quadriceps femoris muscle strength during dynamic knee extension exercise in young adult males and females.

Authors:  Danny M Pincivero; Alan J Coelho; Robert M Campy
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Changes in perceived finger force produced by muscular contractions under isometric and anisometric conditions.

Authors:  N Mai; P Schreiber; J Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Submaximal force production during perceptually guided isometric exercise.

Authors:  Sacha J West; Lynne Smith; Estelle V Lambert; Timothy D Noakes; Alan St Clair Gibson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  The effect of arm abduction angle and contraction intensity on perceived exertion.

Authors:  Mark K Timmons; Staci M Stevens; Danny M Pincivero
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Halving and doubling isometric force: evidence for a decelerating psychophysical function consistent with an equilibrium-point model of motor control.

Authors:  C L Van Doren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-05

6.  Effect of gravity and microgravity on intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Justin S Lawley; Lonnie G Petersen; Erin J Howden; Satyam Sarma; William K Cornwell; Rong Zhang; Louis A Whitworth; Michael A Williams; Benjamin D Levine
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  A critical review of the literature on ratings scales for perceived exertion.

Authors:  R L Carton; E C Rhodes
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Perception of non-voluntary brief contractions in normal subjects and in a deafferented patient.

Authors:  G Nicolas; V Marchand-Pauvert; V Lasserre; C Guihenneuc-Jovyaux; E Pierrot-Deseilligny; L Jami
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Relationship between Respiratory Load Perception and Perception of Nonrespiratory Sensory Modalities in Subjects with Life-Threatening Asthma.

Authors:  Kathleen L Davenport; Chien Hui Huang; Matthew P Davenport; Paul W Davenport
Journal:  Pulm Med       Date:  2012-06-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.