Literature DB >> 4812572

Clinical fetal monitoring. V. Effect on perinatal outcome.

R H Paul, E H Hon.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1974        PMID: 4812572     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)33695-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Electronic monitoring of the fetus and its cost.

Authors:  E J Quilligan
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1975-01

2.  The electronic fetal monitor: should every mother have one?

Authors:  A S Dixon
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Fetal monitoring in labor.

Authors:  C Fleet; E Hopkins; D Chrisolm; G Rose; F Bepko; J George; S Sinkford
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 1.798

4. 

Authors:  F Béguin
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Association of electronic fetal monitoring during labor with cesarean section rate and with neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  J McCusker; D R Harris; D W Hosmer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Cesarean section, fetal monitoring, and perinatal mortality in California.

Authors:  R L Williams; W E Hawes
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Effects of maternal-fetal monitoring on pregnancy outcome in a high risk pregnant population.

Authors:  E L Hopkins; C M Fleet; G J Rose
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 8.  Resistance to Change.

Authors:  Mark I Evans; David W Britt
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.924

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.