Literature DB >> 4759677

Stimulus-response functions of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors in human glabrous skin area.

M Knibestöl.   

Abstract

1. Single unit impulses were recorded from the ulnar and median nerves of awake human subjects with tungsten electrodes inserted percutaneously in the upper arm.2. Forty-nine rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors with receptive fields in the glabrous skin area were studied. Thirty-nine units had small receptive fields with distinct borders (RA-receptors) while ten units had large fields with indistinct borders (PC-receptors).3. The afferent response to stimuli of varying indentation amplitude and velocity of indentation, was analysed.4. Amplitude thresholds varied from 0.05 to 1.65 mm for the RA-receptors. For the PC-receptors amplitude thresholds ranged from less than 0.05 to 1.95 mm.5. Velocity thresholds varied for the RA-receptors from 0.4 to 39.3 mm/sec, and for the PC-receptors from 0.5 to 19.6 mm/sec.6. The conduction velocities of the afferents were all in the A alpha-beta range. For the RA-receptors the conduction velocities ranged from 26 to 91 m/sec (mean = 55.3 +/- 3.4), and for PC-receptors the range was from 34 to 61 m/sec (mean = 46.9 +/- 3.6).7. The nerve impulse frequency as a function of indentation velocity was analysed for nineteen RA-receptors and four PC-receptors. A hyperbolic log tangent function of the type first introduced by Naka & Rushton (1966) in studies on S-potentials in the fish retina was found to be the best description of the stimulus-response function for sixteen RA-receptors and two PC-receptors. For the remaining units a pure logarithmic function was the best description. However, the logarithmic function may be, as found in the present study, a special case of the more general log tanh function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1973        PMID: 4759677      PMCID: PMC1350502          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  25 in total

1.  The initiation of nerve impulses by mesenteric Pacinian corpuscles.

Authors:  J A B GRAY; J L MALCOLM
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1950

2.  Morphology of rapidly and slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the hairless skin of the cat's hind foot.

Authors:  W Jänig
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1971-05-07       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  The form and distribution of the receptive fields of Pacinian corpuscles found in and around the cat's large foot pad.

Authors:  B Lynn
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The discharge from vibration-sensitive receptors in the monkey foot.

Authors:  U Lindblom; L Lund
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 5.330

5.  The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand.

Authors:  W H Talbot; I Darian-Smith; H H Kornhuber; V B Mountcastle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The transfer functions of sensory intensity in the nervous system.

Authors:  L E Lipetz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Activity from skin mechanoreceptors recorded percutaneously in awake human subjects.

Authors:  A B Vallbo; K E Hagbarth
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 5.330

8.  Receptor types in cat hairy skin supplied by myelinated fibers.

Authors:  P R Burgess; D Petit; R M Warren
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Functional properties of mechanoreceptors in glabrous skin of the raccoon's forepaw.

Authors:  L M Pubols; B H Pubols; B L Munger
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 5.330

10.  Neural coding in the sense of touch: human sensations of skin indentation compared with the responses of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents innvervating the hairy skin of monkeys.

Authors:  T Harrington; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  55 in total

1.  Distribution and behaviour of glabrous cutaneous receptors in the human foot sole.

Authors:  Paul M Kennedy; J Timothy Inglis
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents.

Authors:  I Birznieks; P Jenmalm; A W Goodwin; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Stimulus-response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area.

Authors:  M Knibestöl
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Input-output relation of the somatosensory system for mechanical air-puff stimulation of the index finger in man.

Authors:  I Hashimoto; T Gatayama; K Yoshikawa; M Sasaki; M Nomura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Restoring the sense of touch with a prosthetic hand through a brain interface.

Authors:  Gregg A Tabot; John F Dammann; Joshua A Berg; Francesco V Tenore; Jessica L Boback; R Jacob Vogelstein; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Neural Basis of Touch and Proprioception in Primate Cortex.

Authors:  Benoit P Delhaye; Katie H Long; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 9.090

7.  Velocity invariance of receptive field structure in somatosensory cortical area 3b of the alert monkey.

Authors:  J J DiCarlo; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Viscoelastic characterization of the primate finger pad in vivo by microstep indentation and three-dimensional finite element models for tactile sensation studies.

Authors:  Siddarth Kumar; Gang Liu; David W Schloerb; Mandayam A Srinivasan
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Simulating tactile signals from the whole hand with millisecond precision.

Authors:  Hannes P Saal; Benoit P Delhaye; Brandon C Rayhaun; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Merkel cells and neurons keep in touch.

Authors:  Seung-Hyun Woo; Ellen A Lumpkin; Ardem Patapoutian
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 20.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.