Literature DB >> 4751397

Preferences for familiarity and novelty: a model for the simultaneous development of both.

P P Bateson.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1973        PMID: 4751397     DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(73)90117-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Stability and individual variability of social attachment in imprinting.

Authors:  Bastien S Lemaire; Daniele Rucco; Mathilde Josserand; Giorgio Vallortigara; Elisabetta Versace
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Do we enjoy what we sense and perceive? A dissociation between aesthetic appreciation and basic perception of environmental objects or events.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Alexandra A de Sousa; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.526

3.  Newborn chicks show inherited variability in early social predispositions for hen-like stimuli.

Authors:  Elisabetta Versace; Ilaria Fracasso; Gabriele Baldan; Antonella Dalle Zotte; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  "Classifying-together" phenomenon in fish (Xenotoca eiseni): Simultaneous exposure to visual stimuli impairs subsequent discrimination learning.

Authors:  Valeria Anna Sovrano; Greta Baratti; Davide Potrich; Tania Rosà; Veronica Mazza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Statistical learning in domestic chicks is modulated by strain and sex.

Authors:  Chiara Santolin; Orsola Rosa-Salva; Bastien S Lemaire; Lucia Regolin; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Spontaneous Learning of Visual Structures in Domestic Chicks.

Authors:  Orsola Rosa-Salva; József Fiser; Elisabetta Versace; Carola Dolci; Sarah Chehaimi; Chiara Santolin; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  No evidence of spontaneous preference for slowly moving objects in visually naïve chicks.

Authors:  Bastien S Lemaire
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.