Literature DB >> 4719676

The mechanics of esophageal muscle contraction. Evidence of an inotropic effect of gastrin.

S Cohen, F Green.   

Abstract

To compare the mechanical properties of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and esophageal circular smooth muscle, force-velocity determinations were made under various physiological conditions. Isotonic and isometric recordings of opossum circular muscle were used to obtain the velocity of shortening and force, respectively, during alterations in: (a) initial muscle length (preload), (b) afterload, (c) calcium concentration, and (d) gastrin I. Muscle contraction was elicited to the neurogenic response at the termination of electrical stimulation. A change in preload (muscle length) altered the peak force (Po) developed during an afterloaded contraction, but had only a minor effect on the maximum velocity of shortening (V max). At the length of optimal tension development, Lo, (preload, 1.5 g), the LES muscle had a V max of 6.1+/-0.2 mm/s and a Po of 17.7+/-0.7 g. The esophageal muscle at its Lo (preload, 2.0 g) had a V max of 6.3+/-0.5 mm/s and a Po of 18.1+/-1.2 g. A decrease in calcium from 2.5 mM to 1.0 mM significantly reduced the V max and Po of all muscle, but an increase in calcium to 5.0 mM increased these parameters only minimally. At a calcium of 1.0 mM, gastrin I increased both V max and Po of all muscle. This inotropic effect of gastrin I occurred at lower concentrations in LES muscle than in muscle from the upper esophagus. The power (force x velocity) and work (force x muscle shortening) of esophageal and LES muscle were calculated from these data. Both the work and power generated during esophageal and LES muscle contraction were determined by: (a) the initial muscle length as produced by the preload, (b) the afterload against which the muscle was contracting, and (c) the contractility of inotropism of the muscle, that is, the force-velocity curve on which the muscle was operating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1973        PMID: 4719676      PMCID: PMC302485          DOI: 10.1172/JCI107387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0021-9738            Impact factor:   14.808


  24 in total

1.  Implications of muscle mechanics in the heart.

Authors:  E H SONNENBLICK
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1962 Nov-Dec

2.  Some mechanical properties of cat intestinal muscle.

Authors:  R A Meiss
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1971-06

3.  Electrical stimulation of esophageal smooth muscle and effects of antagonists.

Authors:  G F Lund; J Christensen
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1969-11

4.  Lower esophageal sphincter pressure as an index of lower esophageal sphincter strength.

Authors:  S Cohen; L D Harris
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Hormonal control of gastroesophageal-sphincter strength.

Authors:  D O Castell; L D Harris
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1970-04-16       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Force-velocity characteristics of respiratory airway smooth muscle.

Authors:  N L Stephens; E Kroeger; J A Mehta
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 3.531

7.  Esophageal responses to distension and electrical stimulation.

Authors:  J Christensen; G F Lund
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Does hiatus hernia affect competence of the gastroesophageal sphincter?

Authors:  S Cohen; L D Harris
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1971-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Responses of the gastroesophageal junctional zone to increases in abdominal pressure.

Authors:  J F Lind; W G Warrian; W J Wankling
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Hormonal regulation of human lower esophageal sphincter competence: interaction of gastrin and secretin.

Authors:  S Cohen; W Lipshutz
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  17 in total

1.  Reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  W J Dodds; W J Hogan; W N Miller
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1976-01

Review 2.  An overview of the role of calcium antagonists in the treatment of achalasia and diffuse oesophageal spasm.

Authors:  T P Short; E Thomas
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Oesophageal propulsive force and its relation to manometric pressure.

Authors:  C O Russell; N Bright; G Buthpitiya; L Alexander; C Walton; G Whelan
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  The effect of manometric assembly diameter on intraluminal esophageal pressure recording.

Authors:  S B Lydon; W J Dodds; W J Hogan; R C Arndorfer
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1975-10

Review 5.  Finite element simulation of food transport through the esophageal body.

Authors:  Wei Yang; Tat Ching Fung; Kerm Sim Chian; Chuh Khiun Chong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Pressure profile of esophageal peristalsis in normal humans as measured by direct intraesophageal transducers.

Authors:  T J Humphries; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1977-07

7.  Esophageal peristaltic force in man. Response to mechanical and pharmacological alterations.

Authors:  H J Schoen; D W Morris; S Cohen
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1977-07

8.  Modulation of esophageal peristalsis by alterations of body position. Effect of bolus viscosity.

Authors:  C P Dooley; B Schlossmacher; J E Valenzuela
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  Primary oesophageal motility disorders. Current therapeutic concepts.

Authors:  M Traube; R W McCallum
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Criteria for assessing esophageal motility in laparoscopic adjustable gastric band patients: the importance of the lower esophageal contractile segment.

Authors:  Paul Robert Burton; Wendy A Brown; Cheryl Laurie; Geoff Hebbard; Paul E O'Brien
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.