Literature DB >> 469189

Age differences in the effects of perceptual noise.

L L Wright, J W Elias.   

Abstract

Elderly (60 to 82 years) and young (18 to 25 years) subjects were tested on a visual task in which noise items were present but did not require processing to test the hypotheses that elderly persons have more difficulty ignoring irrelevent stimuli and suppressing response competition than do younger persons. Tachistoscopically presented displays contained a precued central target letter either alone or flanked by noise items that required (1) a response the same as, or (2) opposite to that required by the target letter, or (3) did not require a response in this task. No evidence was found to support differentially greater response slowing by the elderly due to the presence of irrelevant stimuli. Elderly persons showed significantly less effects of response competition, suggesting that the two groups processed the task information differently. The results suggest that age differences in effects of perceptual noise and response competition are not general phenomena, but depend upon the demand characteristics of the specific task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 469189     DOI: 10.1093/geronj/34.5.704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol        ISSN: 0022-1422


  8 in total

1.  Age-related changes in selective attention and perceptual load during visual search.

Authors:  David J Madden; Linda K Langley
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2003-03

2.  Executive function in Parkinson's disease: contributions of the dorsal frontostriatal pathways to action and motivation.

Authors:  Susan M Ravizza; John Goudreau; Mauricio R Delgado; Sandra Ruiz
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Aging and speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Effect of fundamental-frequency and sentence-onset differences on speech-identification performance of young and older adults in a competing-talker background.

Authors:  Jae Hee Lee; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Age-related differences in distractor interference on line bisection.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Alessandro Iavarone; Leonardo Iaccarino; Marco La Marra; Giovanni Messina; Vincenzo De Luca; Marcellino Monda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Evidence that ageing yields improvements as well as declines across attention and executive functions.

Authors:  João Veríssimo; Paul Verhaeghen; Noreen Goldman; Maxine Weinstein; Michael T Ullman
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-08-19

7.  Repeated Measurement of the Components of Attention of Older Adults using the Two Versions of the Attention Network Test: Stability, Isolability, Robustness, and Reliability.

Authors:  Yoko Ishigami; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  A neuropsychological instrument measuring age-related cerebral decline in older drivers: development, reliability, and validity of MedDrive.

Authors:  Paul Vaucher; Isabel Cardoso; Janet L Veldstra; Daniela Herzig; Michael Herzog; Patrice Mangin; Bernard Favrat
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.