Literature DB >> 464588

Comparison between agar and broth minimum inhibitory concentrations of cefamandole, Cefoxitin, and cefuroxime.

M Rylander, J E Brorson, J Johnsson, R Norrby.   

Abstract

The in vitro susceptibility to cefamandole, cefoxitin, and cefuroxime of clinical isolates of Streptococcus faecalis, Klebsiella, and indole-positive Proteus was assayed using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determinations in broth and on solid media. It could be demonstrated that the agar dilution MICs obtained when S. faecalis was tested against cefuroxime and when indole-positive Proteus strains were tested against cefamandole tended to be considerably lower than those obtained with the broth dilution technique. The Klebsiella strains tested did not show any major differences with regard to MICs in broth or on solid media. Using an animal experimental infection model it could be demonstrated that with indole-positive Proteus the higher broth MIC correlated better to the observed data than the lower agar MIC when a beta-lactamase-producing strain was tested. The data obtained indicated that the beta-lactamase of the indole-positive Proteus strain was inducible. The results of the study gave evidence for a risk of false susceptibility of some bacterial species against cefamandole when agar techniques, e.g. paper disk diffusion, are used. For cefuroxime, the same phenomenon can be expected with S. faecalis and to some extent with indole-positive Proteus. In this study, cefoxitin seemed considerably less affected by the technique used for susceptibility testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 464588      PMCID: PMC352713          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.15.4.572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  7 in total

1.  Effect of inoculum and of beta-lactamase on the anti-staphylococcal activity of thirteen penicillins and cephalosporins.

Authors:  L D Sabath; C Garner; C Wilcox; M Finland
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Susceptibility of Enterobacter to cefamandole: evidence for a high mutation rate to resistance.

Authors:  C M Findell; J C Sherris
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Comparative in-vitro activity of cefamandole, cefoxitin, cefuroxime and cephalothin.

Authors:  J E Brorson; R Norrby
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis Suppl       Date:  1978

4.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method.

Authors:  A W Bauer; W M Kirby; J C Sherris; M Turck
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Comparison of in vitro antibacterial activity of three oral cephalosporins: cefaclor, cephalexin, and cephradine.

Authors:  M S Silver; G W Counts; D Zeleznik; M Turck
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Cefazaflur, a new parenteral cephalosporin: in vitro studies.

Authors:  G W Counts; D Gregory; D Zeleznik; M Turch
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Novel method for detection of beta-lactamases by using a chromogenic cephalosporin substrate.

Authors:  C H O'Callaghan; A Morris; S M Kirby; A H Shingler
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 5.191

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Discrepancies between disk diffusion and broth susceptibility studies of the activity of ticarcillin plus clavulanic acid against ticarcillin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  F A Manian; R H Alford
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to chloramphenicol and eight beta-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  M C Thirumoorthi; D M Kobos; A S Dajani
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Interlaboratory variation of antibiograms of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains with conventional and commercial testing systems.

Authors:  K E Aldridge; A Janney; C V Sanders; R L Marier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Norfloxacin penetration into subcutaneous tissue cage fluid in rabbits and efficacy in vivo.

Authors:  M Rylander; S R Norrby
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  LY127935, a new beta-lactam antibiotic, versus Proteus, Klebsiella, Serratia, and Pseudomonas.

Authors:  D J Flournoy; F A Perryman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Activity of cefoperazone against ampicillin-resistant bacteria in agar and broth dilution tests.

Authors:  F H Kayser; G Morenzoni; F Homberger
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Antibiofilm effects of N,O-acetals derived from 2-amino-1,4-naphthoquinone are associated with downregulation of important global virulence regulators in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Juliana Silva Novais; Mariana Fernandes Carvalho; Mariana Severo Ramundo; Cristiana Ossaille Beltrame; Reinaldo Barros Geraldo; Alessandro Kappel Jordão; Vítor Francisco Ferreira; Helena Carla Castro; Agnes Marie Sá Figueiredo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  CombiANT: Antibiotic interaction testing made easy.

Authors:  Nikos Fatsis-Kavalopoulos; Roderich Roemhild; Po-Cheng Tang; Johan Kreuger; Dan I Andersson
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 8.029

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.