Literature DB >> 464567

Interpretation of the disk diffusion susceptibility test for amikacin: report of a collaborative study.

J A Washington, P K Yu, T L Gavan, F D Schoenknecht, C Thornsberry.   

Abstract

Because excessively high rates of false resistance have been encountered with the 10-mug amikacin disk in diffusion susceptibility tests, a study was performed to examine existing zone diameter interpretative criteria and to compare the accuracy of 10- and 30-mug amikacin disks by the error rate-bounded classification scheme. Although current zone diameter interpretative criteria eliminate false susceptibles, there is an unacceptably high rate of false resistants. This problem can be resolved in most instances by revising the zone diameter interpretative criteria for the 10-mug disk (resistant, </=9 mm; indeterminate, 10 to 11 mm; susceptible, >/=12 mm) or, preferably, by replacing the 10-mug disk with a 30-mug disk and adopting new interpretative criteria (resistant, </=14 mm; indeterminate, 15 to 16 mm; susceptible, >/=17 mm). Because of significant differences in performance among media, it is necessary to include Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 among controls routinely tested and to exclude from use lots of Mueller-Hinton agar yielding results outside the 75% tolerance (90% confidence) limits for amikacin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 464567      PMCID: PMC352673          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.15.3.400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  10 in total

1.  Resistance to gentamicin, tobramycin and amikacin among clinical isolates of bacteria.

Authors:  R C Moellering; C Wennersten; L J Kunz; J W Poitras
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Susceptibility tests of anaerobic bacteria: statistical and clinical considerations.

Authors:  C M Metzler; R M DeHaan
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Emergence in a burn center of populations of bacteria resistant to gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin: evidence for the need for changes in zone diameter interpretative standards.

Authors:  B H Minshew; H M Pollock; F D Schoenknecht; J C Sherris
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Uniformity in sensitivity test media.

Authors:  P M Waterworth
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method.

Authors:  A W Bauer; W M Kirby; J C Sherris; M Turck
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to gentamicin and related aminoglycoside antibiotics.

Authors:  R K Holmes; B H Minshew; I K Gould; J P Sanford
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Effect of different lots of Mueller-Hinton agar on the interpretation of the gentamicin susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  H M Pollock; B H Minshew; M A Kenny; F D Schoenknecht
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Significance of antimicrobial synergism for the outcome of gram negative sepsis.

Authors:  J Klastersky; F Meunier-Carpentier; J M Prevost
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.378

9.  Effect of medium composition on the apparent sensitivity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to gentamicin.

Authors:  L P Garrod; P M Waterworth
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Effect of cation content of agar on the activity of gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  J A Washington; R J Snyder; P C Kohner; C G Wiltse; D M Ilstrup; J T McCall
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 5.226

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  [Resistance of clinical isolates of some Enterobacteriaceae as well as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus faecalis to chemotherapeutic agents. Results of an inter-regional cooperative study for the years 1980 and 1981].

Authors:  B Wiedemann
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Interpretive standards for disk susceptibility tests with Sch 21420 and amikacin.

Authors:  A L Barry; C Thornsberry; R N Jones; E H Gerlach
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Proposed zone standards for interpretation of fortimicin A disk diffusion tests.

Authors:  A L Barry; C Thornsberry; R N Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of a commercial microdilution system for quantitative susceptibility testing of aminoglycosides against multidrug-resistant, gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  L R Peterson; D N Gerding; M M Johnson; J E Cherne; B J Opfer; W H Hall
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Gentamicin and amikacin disk susceptibility tests with Pseudomonas aeruginosa: definition of minimal inhibitory concentration correlates for susceptible and resistant categories.

Authors:  A L Barry; C Thornsberry; R N Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Quality control in antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing: a Belgian multicenter study.

Authors:  S Lauwers; J Philippe; A Van Zeebroeck; D Pierard; M P Derde; L Kaufman
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.267

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.