Literature DB >> 4623852

Microspectrophotometry of arthropod visual screening pigments.

G K Strother, A J Casella.   

Abstract

Absorption spectra of visual screening pigments obtained in vitro with a microspectrophotometer using frozen sections are given for the insects Musca domestica, Phormia regina, Libellula luctuosa, Apis mellifera (worker honeybee only), Drosophila melanogaster (wild type only) and the arachnids Lycosa baltimoriana and Lycosa miami. The spectral range covered is 260-700 nm for Lycosa and Drosophila and 310-700 nm for the remainder of the arthropods. A complete description of the instrumentation is given. For the flies, Phormia and Musca, light absorption by the yellow and red pigments is high from 310 to about 610 nm. This implies that for these insects there should be no wavelength shift in electroretinogram (ERG) results due to light leakage among neighboring ommatidia for this wavelength range. The same comment applies to Calliphora erythrocephala, which is known to have similar screening pigments. For some of the insects studied a close correspondence is noted between screening pigment absorption spectra and spectral sensitivity curves for individual photoreceptors, available in the literature. In some cases the screening pigment absorption spectra can be related to chemical extraction results, with the general observation that some of the in vitro absorption peaks are shifted to the red. The Lycosa, Apis, and Libellula dark red pigments absorb strongly over a wide spectral range and therefore prevent chemical identification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1972        PMID: 4623852      PMCID: PMC2203196          DOI: 10.1085/jgp.59.5.616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1295            Impact factor:   4.086


  9 in total

1.  [Ommochromes. XIV. Distribution of ommins in animal kingdom].

Authors:  A BUTENANDT; E BIEKERT; B LINZEN
Journal:  Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem       Date:  1958

2.  Photoreceptor structures. II. Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J J WOLKEN; A D MELLON; G CONTIS
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1957-03

3.  Microspectrophotometry of single rhabdomeres in the insect eye.

Authors:  H Langer; B Thorell
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 3.905

4.  Spectral sensitivities of wolf spider eyes.

Authors:  R D DeVoe; R J Small; J E Zvargulis
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Cytological and Cytophotometric Analysis of Binucleated Red Blood Cell Mutants (bn) in Turkeys (MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO).

Authors:  S E Bloom; E G Buss; G K Strother
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The nature of the retinal action potential, and the spectral sensitivities of ultraviolet and green receptor systems of the compound eye of the worker honey-bee.

Authors:  T H GOLDSMITH
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1960-03       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  The sensitivity of housefly photoreceptors in the mid-ultraviolet and the limits of the visible spectrum.

Authors:  T H Goldsmith; H R Fernandez
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Absorption of Musca domestica Screening Pigment.

Authors:  G K Strother
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1966-05-01       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  The Components of the Visual System of a Dragonfly.

Authors:  P Ruck
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1965-11-01       Impact factor: 4.086

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Why Drosophila to study phototransduction?

Authors:  William L Pak
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.250

Review 2.  Functional interplay of visual, sensitizing and screening pigments in the eyes of Drosophila and other red-eyed dipteran flies.

Authors:  D G Stavenga; M F Wehling; G Belušič
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The large pigment cell of the compound eye of the house fly Musca domestica. Fine structure and cytoarchitectural associations.

Authors:  C Chi; S D Carlson
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1976-07-20       Impact factor: 5.249

4.  Modification of spectral sensitivities by screening pigments in the compound eyes of twilight-active fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae).

Authors:  A B Lall; G K Strother; T W Cronin; H H Seliger
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Metarhodopsin control by arrestin, light-filtering screening pigments, and visual pigment turnover in invertebrate microvillar photoreceptors.

Authors:  Doekele G Stavenga; Roger C Hardie
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 6.  PDA (prolonged depolarizing afterpotential)-defective mutants: the story of nina's and ina's--pinta and santa maria, too.

Authors:  William L Pak; Shikoh Shino; Hung-Tat Leung
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 1.250

7.  A semi-automatic and quantitative method to evaluate behavioral photosensitivity in animals based on the optomotor response (OMR).

Authors:  Megumi Matsuo; Yoriko Ando; Yasuhiro Kamei; Shoji Fukamachi
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.422

8.  The spectral sensitivity of Drosophila photoreceptors.

Authors:  Camilla R Sharkey; Jorge Blanco; Maya M Leibowitz; Daniel Pinto-Benito; Trevor J Wardill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Flower Mimics Roll Out Multicolored Carpets to Lure and Kill the House Fly.

Authors:  Hamady Dieng; Tomomitsu Satho; Nor Hafisa Syafina Binti Mohd Radzi; Fatimah Abang; Nur Faeza A Kassim; Wan Fatma Zuharah; Nur Aida Hashim; Ronald E Morales Vargas; Noppawan P Morales
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.769

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.