Literature DB >> 3351784

Modification of spectral sensitivities by screening pigments in the compound eyes of twilight-active fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae).

A B Lall1, G K Strother, T W Cronin, H H Seliger.   

Abstract

1. ERG S(lambda) were determined in dark-adapted intact preparations of 6 North American firefly species (Photinus collustrans, marginellus, pyralis, macdermotti, scintillans and Bicellonycha wickershamorum) which restrict their flashing activity to twilight hours. The curves possess narrow (1/2 bandwidth = 50-60 nm) peaks in the yellow (560-580 nm) and a shoulder in the violet (370-420 nm), with a marked attenuation (1.4-2.2 log units) of sensitivity in the green (480-530 nm) region of the spectrum (Fig. 1). Two additional species (Photuris potomaca and frontalis) which initiate flashing at twilight and continue on late into the night (twi-night) possess broad sensitivity maxima around 560 nm (Fig. 3). 2. Selective adaptation experiments isolated near-UV and yellow in P. scintillans (Fig. 2). In the dorsal frontal region of the compound eyes in P. frontalis, high sensitivity existed only in the short wavelength region (near-UV and blue) with a maximum in the blue (lambda max 435 nm) (Fig. 4). 3. The in situ MSP absorption spectrum of the screening pigments was determined in preparations of firefly retina. a) Two kinds of dark brown granules were found in the clear zone region. These granules absorb all across the spectrum with a gradual increase in optical density in the shorter wavelength region in P. pyralis (Fig. 5). b) Besides dark granules, pink-to-red colored screening pigments were present in the vicinity of the rhabdoms. The absorption spectra of these pigments determined in five species were narrow (1/2 bandwidth = 50-80 nm) with species-specific differences in their peak absorption in the green at 525 nm, 510 nm, 512 nm and 517 nm in P. scintillans, macdermotti, collustrans and pyralis, respectively (Fig. 6). A similar pigment was found in P. marginellus with a lambda max at 512 nm (Fig. 7). In all cases, transmission increased both at long and short wavelengths, but more sharply in the long wavelength region (Figs. 6 and 7). Hence each twilight-restricted species has its own unique colored screening pigment. A yellow pigment whose absorption spectrum differed from those found in genus Photinus was found in twi-night active Photuris potomaca (lambda max 461 nm) and night-active P. versicolor (lambda max 456 nm). The transmission of the Photuris pigment increased sharply only in the long wave-length region (Fig. 8).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3351784     DOI: 10.1007/bf01342700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  16 in total

1.  Simplified recording microspectrophotometer.

Authors:  A J Casella; G K Strother; J W Connolly
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1975-03-01       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  Visual pigments and visual range underwater.

Authors:  J N Lythgoe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Retinal oil globule counts and distributions in two species of turtles: Pseudemys scripta elegans (Wied) and Chelonia mydas mydas (Linnaeus).

Authors:  A M Granda; K W Haden
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  New wavelength dependent visual pigment nomograms.

Authors:  T G Ebrey; B Honig
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Visual pigments and environmental light.

Authors:  J N Lythgoe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The fine structure of the compound eye of the African armyworm moth, Spodoptera exempta Walk. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae).

Authors:  C C Meinecke
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  The effects of screening pigments on the spectral sensitivity of some crustacea with scotopic (superposition) eyes.

Authors:  T H Goldsmith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Calculated effects of "screening pigments".

Authors:  E B Goldstein; T P Williams
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1966-02       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The cone oil droplets of avian retinas.

Authors:  T H Goldsmith; J S Collins; S Licht
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Spectral sensitivity and retinal pigment movement in the crab Leptograpsus variegatus (fabricius).

Authors:  S Stowe
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  12 in total

1.  Extraordinary diversity of visual opsin genes in dragonflies.

Authors:  Ryo Futahashi; Ryouka Kawahara-Miki; Michiyo Kinoshita; Kazutoshi Yoshitake; Shunsuke Yajima; Kentaro Arikawa; Takema Fukatsu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Changes in electrophysiological properties of photoreceptors in Periplaneta americana associated with the loss of screening pigment.

Authors:  Paulus Saari; Esa-Ville Immonen; Joni Kemppainen; Kyösti Heimonen; Marianna Zhukovskaya; Ekaterina Novikova; Andrew S French; Päivi H Torkkeli; Hongxia Liu; Roman V Frolov
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Vision in click beetles (Coleoptera: Elateridae): pigments and spectral correspondence between visual sensitivity and species bioluminescence emission.

Authors:  Abner B Lall; Thomas W Cronin; Alexandre A Carvalho; John M de Souza; Marcelo P Barros; Cassius V Stevani; Etelvino J H Bechara; Dora F Ventura; Vadim R Viviani; Avionne A Hill
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Spectral sensitivity of the compound eyes in two day-active fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae: Lucidota).

Authors:  A B Lall; J E Lloyd
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Variation in opsin genes correlates with signalling ecology in North American fireflies.

Authors:  S E Sander; D W Hall
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Overcoming the loss of blue sensitivity through opsin duplication in the largest animal group, beetles.

Authors:  Camilla R Sharkey; M Stanley Fujimoto; Nathan P Lord; Seunggwan Shin; Duane D McKenna; Anton Suvorov; Gavin J Martin; Seth M Bybee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Molecular variation across populations of a widespread North American firefly, Photinus pyralis, reveals that coding changes do not underlie flash color variation or associated visual sensitivity.

Authors:  Sarah E Lower; Kathrin F Stanger-Hall; David W Hall
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  A cure for the blues: opsin duplication and subfunctionalization for short-wavelength sensitivity in jewel beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae).

Authors:  Nathan P Lord; Rebecca L Plimpton; Camilla R Sharkey; Anton Suvorov; Jonathan P Lelito; Barry M Willardson; Seth M Bybee
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Red-shift of spectral sensitivity due to screening pigment migration in the eyes of a moth, Adoxophyes orana.

Authors:  Aya Satoh; Finlay J Stewart; Hisaharu Koshitaka; Hiroshi D Akashi; Primož Pirih; Yasushi Sato; Kentaro Arikawa
Journal:  Zoological Lett       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.836

10.  Short- and mid-wavelength artificial light influences the flash signals of Aquatica ficta fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae).

Authors:  Avalon Celeste Stevahn Owens; Victor Benno Meyer-Rochow; En-Cheng Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.