Literature DB >> 458046

Selective adaptation to frequency-modulated tones: evidence for an information-processing channel selectively sensitive to frequency changes.

D Regan, B W Tansley.   

Abstract

Exposure to an FM tone elevates FM threshold but not AM threshold. This holds for a wide range of frequency deviations (delta F = +/- 0.4 Hz- +/- 30 Hz at least) provided that modulation frequency is low (fm = 2 Hz), but if fm is somewhat higher (e.g., 8 Hz) the finding only holds for small frequency deviations. FM threshold can rise with time up to an adapting duration of at least 1200 s, through this buildup depends on frequency deviation. Exposure to an AM tone elevates AM threshold, but not FM threshold, over a wide range of modulation depths (at least m = 5%--50%). Quasi-FM (QFM) adapting tones resemble FM adapting tones in their effects upon FM and AM sensitivities, even though QFM and AM adapting tones have identical power spectra. Exposure to a pure tone produces no difference between FM and AM threshold elevations. These data can be explained if the human auditory pathway contains separate information-processing channels for AM and FM signals whose sensitivities do not overlap even with suprathreshold stimuli. We suppose that the FM channel (but not the AM channel) is sensitive to changing differences (or ratios) between signals from different sites along the basilar membrane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 458046     DOI: 10.1121/1.382792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  A comparison of monaural and binaural responses to frequency modulated (FM) sweeps in cat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  J R Mendelson; K L Grasse
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Forward masking of frequency modulation.

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Magdalena Wojtczak; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Separable developmental trajectories for the abilities to detect auditory amplitude and frequency modulation.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Andrew T Sabin; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Functional topography of cat primary auditory cortex: responses to frequency-modulated sweeps.

Authors:  J R Mendelson; C E Schreiner; M L Sutter; K L Grasse
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Multiple channels of visual time perception.

Authors:  Aurelio Bruno; Guido Marco Cicchini
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-02-19

6.  Duration channels mediate human time perception.

Authors:  James Heron; Craig Aaen-Stockdale; John Hotchkiss; Neil W Roach; Paul V McGraw; David Whitaker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Dissociable neural response signatures for slow amplitude and frequency modulation in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Molly J Henry; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Chronotopic maps in human supplementary motor area.

Authors:  Foteini Protopapa; Masamichi J Hayashi; Shrikanth Kulashekhar; Wietske van der Zwaag; Giovanni Battistella; Micah M Murray; Ryota Kanai; Domenica Bueti
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  The frequency modulated auditory evoked response (FMAER), a technical advance for study of childhood language disorders: cortical source localization and selected case studies.

Authors:  Frank H Duffy; Yaman Z Eksioglu; Alexander Rotenberg; Joseph R Madsen; Aditi Shankardass; Heidelise Als
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.474

10.  Aftereffects of Spectrally Similar and Dissimilar Spectral Motion Adaptors in the Tritone Paradox.

Authors:  Stephanie Malek; Konrad Sperschneider
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.