Literature DB >> 1176620

Evaluation of the R/B and Minitek systems for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

M Shayegani, M E Hubbard, T Hiscott, D McGlynn.   

Abstract

The R/B and Minitek systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae were evaluated, and the results were compared with those obtained by conventional methods. Both systems were rapid and allowed correct identification of about 85% of the 294 isolates (23 species) examined. The individual biochemical reactions showed an overall agreement of 92.6% and 93.1% for the R/B and Minitek systems, respectively.

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1975        PMID： 1176620      PMCID： PMC275169          DOI： 10.1128/jcm.1.6.504-508.1975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN： 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  16 in total

1.  A clinical evaluation of the API microtube system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  K A Brooks; M Jens; T M Sodeman
Journal:  Am J Med Technol       Date:  1974-02

2.  r-b Expanders: their use in identifying routinely and unusually reacting members of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  H D Isenberg; P B Smith; A Balows; B G Painter; D L Rhoden; K Tomfohrde
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-03

3.  API system: a multitube micromethod for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  P B Smith; K M Tomfohrde; D L Rhoden; A Balows
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-09

4.  A comparison of multiple-test systems for the presumptive identification of enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  M Goldin
Journal:  Am J Med Technol       Date:  1972-08

5.  Evaluation of modified R-B system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  G T McIlroy; P K Yu; W J Martin; J A Washington
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-09

6.  Evaluation of the four tube R-B system for identification of Serratia marcescens and Serratia liquefaciens.

Authors:  W J Brown
Journal:  Am J Med Technol       Date:  1973-07

7.  Clinical laboratory experience with the improved Enterotube.

Authors:  B G Painter; H D Isenberg
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-06

8.  Evaluation of the improved Auxotab 1 System for identifying Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  D L Rhoden; K M Tomfohrde; P B Smith; A Balows
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-08

9.  Evaluation of the BBL Minitek system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  S L Hansen; D R Hardesty; B M Myers
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-11

10.  Evaluation of reagent-impregnated strips for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  W J Martin; S F Bartes; M M Ball
Journal:  Am J Med Technol       Date:  1971-03
View more
  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of the enteric analyzer for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  M Shayegani; M E Hubbard; T Hiscott; D M McGlynn; R C Yewdall
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  An evaluation of the Modified R/B Enteric Differential System for the identification of the Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  L J Hayek; G W Willis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Identification of Pasteurella multocida and Pasteurella haemolytica by API 20E, Minitek, and Oxi/Ferm systems.

Authors:  M T Collins; N Weaver; R P Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Simplified scheme for identification of prompt lactose-fermenting members of the Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  M J Hicks; K J Ryan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of three methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  P C Appelbaum; R R Arthur; M E Parker; G L Shugar; L C von Kuster; P Charache
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.267
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.