Literature DB >> 454236

Woodpecker drilling behavior. An endorsement of the rotational theory of impact brain injury.

P R May, J M Fuster, J Haber, A Hirschman.   

Abstract

High-speed cinematograph films of a drilling woodpecker were examined by direct visual inspection and by a microdensitometer and computer-imaging technique. These showed (1) that the drilling trajectory is essentially linear, with very little, if any, rotation of the head; (2) that there is minimal movement after impact; (3) that the impact velocity is of the order of 600 to 700 cm/s; and (4) that the impact deceleration is of the order of 1,000 g. Dynamic and morphologic findings in the woodpecker may be highly relevant to the prevention of concussion and brain injury in man. Taken in the context of modern packaging technology and other animal and mathematical modelling research, they suggest that brain injury preventive systems could be greatly improved over those now in common use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 454236     DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1979.00500420080011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Neurol        ISSN: 0003-9942


  11 in total

1.  Can woodpeckers play rugby or Charles Darwin, where are you when we need you?

Authors:  P McCrory
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Auditory brainstem responses and auditory thresholds in woodpeckers.

Authors:  Bernard Lohr; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Hierarchical multiscale structure-property relationships of the red-bellied woodpecker (Melanerpes carolinus) beak.

Authors:  Nayeon Lee; M F Horstemeyer; Hongjoo Rhee; Ben Nabors; Jun Liao; Lakiesha N Williams
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Structural analysis of the tongue and hyoid apparatus in a woodpecker.

Authors:  Jae-Young Jung; Steven E Naleway; Nicholas A Yaraghi; Steven Herrera; Vincent R Sherman; Eric A Bushong; Mark H Ellisman; David Kisailus; Joanna McKittrick
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Why do woodpeckers resist head impact injury: a biomechanical investigation.

Authors:  Lizhen Wang; Jason Tak-Man Cheung; Fang Pu; Deyu Li; Ming Zhang; Yubo Fan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Response of Woodpecker's Head during Pecking Process Simulated by Material Point Method.

Authors:  Yuzhe Liu; Xinming Qiu; Xiong Zhang; T X Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Passive Cushiony Biomechanics of Head Protection in Falling Geckos.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Wenbo Wang; Yi Song; Lei Cai; Zhendong Dai
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 1.781

8.  Consider the woodpecker: The contested more-than-human ethics of biomimetic technology and traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Gregory Hollin
Journal:  Soc Stud Sci       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 3.885

9.  Mathematical Models of Blast-Induced TBI: Current Status, Challenges, and Prospects.

Authors:  Raj K Gupta; Andrzej Przekwas
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 10.  Unconventional animal models for traumatic brain injury and chronic traumatic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Nicole L Ackermans; Merina Varghese; Bridget Wicinski; Joshua Torres; Rita De Gasperi; Dylan Pryor; Gregory A Elder; Miguel A Gama Sosa; Joy S Reidenberg; Terrie M Williams; Patrick R Hof
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.164

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.