Literature DB >> 24812053

Hierarchical multiscale structure-property relationships of the red-bellied woodpecker (Melanerpes carolinus) beak.

Nayeon Lee1, M F Horstemeyer, Hongjoo Rhee, Ben Nabors, Jun Liao, Lakiesha N Williams.   

Abstract

We experimentally studied beaks of the red-bellied woodpecker to elucidate the hierarchical multiscale structure-property relationships. At the macroscale, the beak comprises three structural layers: an outer rhamphotheca layer (keratin sheath), a middle foam layer and an inner bony layer. The area fraction of each layer changes along the length of the beak giving rise to a varying constitutive behaviour similar to functionally graded materials. At the microscale, the rhamphotheca comprises keratin scales that are placed in an overlapping pattern; the middle foam layer has a porous structure; and the bony layer has a big centre cavity. At the nanoscale, a wavy gap between the keratin scales similar to a suture line was evidenced in the rhamphotheca; the middle foam layer joins two dissimilar materials; and mineralized collagen fibres were revealed in the inner bony layer. The nano- and micro-indentation tests revealed that the hardness (associated with the strength, modulus and stiffness) of the rhamphotheca layer (approx. 470 MPa for nano and approx. 320 MPa for micro) was two to three times less than that of the bony layer (approx. 1200 MPa for nano and approx. 630 MPa for micro). When compared to other birds (chicken, finch and toucan), the woodpecker's beak has more elongated keratin scales that can slide over each other thus admitting dissipation via shearing; has much less porosity in the bony layer thus strengthening the beak and focusing the stress wave; and has a wavy suture that admits local shearing at the nanoscale. The analysis of the woodpeckers' beaks provides some understanding of biological structural materials' mechanisms for energy absorption.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beak; energy absorption; multiscale structure; woodpecker

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24812053      PMCID: PMC4032540          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  17 in total

1.  Mineralized collagen fibrils: a mechanical model with a staggered arrangement of mineral particles.

Authors:  I Jäger; P Fratzl
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Materials become insensitive to flaws at nanoscale: lessons from nature.

Authors:  Huajian Gao; Baohua Ji; Ingomar L Jager; Eduard Arzt; Peter Fratzl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Stiffness and strength of suture joints in nature.

Authors:  Yaning Li; Christine Ortiz; Mary C Boyce
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2011-12-29

4.  Bioinspired, mechanical, deterministic fractal model for hierarchical suture joints.

Authors:  Yaning Li; Christine Ortiz; Mary C Boyce
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2012-03-01

5.  Structural tissue organization in the beak of Java and Darwin's finches.

Authors:  Annelies Genbrugge; Dominique Adriaens; Barbara De Kegel; Loes Brabant; Luc Van Hoorebeke; Jeffrey Podos; Joris Dirckx; Peter Aerts; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Woodpecker drilling behavior. An endorsement of the rotational theory of impact brain injury.

Authors:  P R May; J M Fuster; J Haber; A Hirschman
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1979-06

7.  Woodpeckers and head injury.

Authors:  P R May; J M Fuster; P Newman; A Hirschman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-02-28       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Comparative study of the mechanical properties, micro-structure, and composition of the cranial and beak bones of the great spotted woodpecker and the lark bird.

Authors:  LiZhen Wang; HongQuan Zhang; YuBo Fan
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 6.038

9.  Mechanical properties of cranial sutures.

Authors:  C R Jaslow
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Cranial sutures work collectively to distribute strain throughout the reptile skull.

Authors:  Neil Curtis; M E H Jones; S E Evans; P O'Higgins; M J Fagan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 4.118

View more
  4 in total

1.  Bio-Inspired Sutures: Using Finite Element Analysis to Parameterize the Mechanical Response of Dovetail Sutures in Simulated Bending of a Curved Structure.

Authors:  Melissa M Gibbons; Diana A Chen
Journal:  Biomimetics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-16

2.  Structural analysis of the tongue and hyoid apparatus in a woodpecker.

Authors:  Jae-Young Jung; Steven E Naleway; Nicholas A Yaraghi; Steven Herrera; Vincent R Sherman; Eric A Bushong; Mark H Ellisman; David Kisailus; Joanna McKittrick
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Response of Woodpecker's Head during Pecking Process Simulated by Material Point Method.

Authors:  Yuzhe Liu; Xinming Qiu; Xiong Zhang; T X Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Disassociated rhamphotheca of fossil bird Confuciusornis informs early beak reconstruction, stress regime, and developmental patterns.

Authors:  Case Vincent Miller; Michael Pittman; Thomas G Kaye; Xiaoli Wang; Jen A Bright; Xiaoting Zheng
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2020-09-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.