Literature DB >> 449434

The impact of a computerized medical record summary system on incidence and length of hospitalization.

J L Rogers, O M Haring.   

Abstract

The present study examined the influence of a computerized medical record summary system on incidence and length of hospitalization. Additional indicators of process of care were also considered. A prospective, randomized design was used where 241 experimental patients had a computerized medical record summary and 238 control patients had the traditional medical record. All patients were followed and compared over a two-year period. Although no difference in incidence of hospitalization was found between patients with and without the summary, during the second year, patients with summaries spent fewer days in the hospital. Patients with summaries also had more completed referrals for consultation, assigned diets, detected new problems and diagnostic tests on record than patients without the summary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 449434     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-197906000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  11 in total

1.  Changing doctor prescribing behaviour.

Authors:  P S Gill; M Mäkelä; K M Vermeulen; N Freemantle; G Ryan; C Bond; T Thorsen; F M Haaijer-Ruskamp
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-08

2.  Spreadsheet evaluation of computerized medical records: the impact on quality, time, and money.

Authors:  N Pliskin; M Glezerman; I Modai; D Weiler
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  A case for the complete medical record: a renewed basis for patient care and reimbursement.

Authors:  P Swamidoss; T Thompson
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  Epileptologist's assistant: a cost effective expert system.

Authors:  H J Doller; W Hostetler; K Krishnamurthy; L L Peterson
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1993

5.  The efficiency of preoperative evaluation: a comparison of computerized and paper recording systems.

Authors:  K I Jackson; G L Gibby; J J van der Aa; A A Arroyo; J S Gravenstein
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1994-05

6.  No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice.

Authors:  A D Oxman; M A Thomson; D A Davis; R B Haynes
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Computerized clinical decision support systems for primary preventive care: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review of effects on process of care and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Nathan M Souza; Rolf J Sebaldt; Jean A Mackay; Jeanette C Prorok; Lorraine Weise-Kelly; Tamara Navarro; Nancy L Wilczynski; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 8.  Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve practitioners' diagnostic test ordering behavior? A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review.

Authors:  Pavel S Roshanov; John J You; Jasmine Dhaliwal; David Koff; Jean A Mackay; Lorraine Weise-Kelly; Tamara Navarro; Nancy L Wilczynski; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 9.  Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review.

Authors:  Pavel S Roshanov; Shikha Misra; Hertzel C Gerstein; Amit X Garg; Rolf J Sebaldt; Jean A Mackay; Lorraine Weise-Kelly; Tamara Navarro; Nancy L Wilczynski; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  HARVEST, a longitudinal patient record summarizer.

Authors:  Jamie S Hirsch; Jessica S Tanenbaum; Sharon Lipsky Gorman; Connie Liu; Eric Schmitz; Dritan Hashorva; Artem Ervits; David Vawdrey; Marc Sturm; Noémie Elhadad
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.