Literature DB >> 4442702

Chromosome segregation mechanisms.

R B Nicklas.   

Abstract

Most aspects of chromosome distribution to the daughter cells in meiosis and mitosis are now understood, at the cellular level. The most striking evidence that the proposed explanation is valid is that it correctly predicts the outcome of experiments on living cells in which the experimenter (1) can determine the distribution of any chosen chromosome to a chosen daughter cell, (2) can induce a mal-orientation, and (3) can stabilize a mal-orientation, causing non-disjunction of a chosen bivalent. Recent reviews of chromosome distribution mechanisms are also considered, in an attempt to clarify the remaining unsolved problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1974        PMID: 4442702      PMCID: PMC1213180     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  4 in total

1.  Holocentric chromosomes in Oncopeltus: kinetochore plates are present in mitosis but absent in meiosis.

Authors:  D E Comings; T A Okada
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  The induction of orientational instability and bivalent interlocking at meiosis.

Authors:  M E Buss; S A Henderson
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Co-orientation stability by physical tension: A demonstration with experimentally interlocked bivalents.

Authors:  S A Henderson; C A Koch
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Chromosome micromanipulation. II. Induced reorientation and the experimental control of segregation in meiosis.

Authors:  R B Nicklas
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1967       Impact factor: 4.316

  4 in total
  40 in total

1.  Altered patterns of multiple recombinant events are associated with nondisjunction of chromosome 21.

Authors:  Tiffany Renee Oliver; Stuart W Tinker; Emily Graves Allen; Natasha Hollis; Adam E Locke; Lora J H Bean; Reshmi Chowdhury; Ferdouse Begum; Mary Marazita; Vivian Cheung; Eleanor Feingold; Stephanie L Sherman
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Differential mechanisms governing segregation of a univalent in oocytes and spermatocytes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Puro
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  C-band morphology of T(8;9)/8;9 in Blattella germanica.

Authors:  M H Ross; C B Keil
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Meiotic drive for B-chromosomes in the primary oocytes of Myrmeleotettix maculatus (Orthopera: Acrididae).

Authors:  G M Hewitt
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1976-07-30       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Morewright (mwr), a new meiotic mutant of Drosophila melanogaster affecting nonexchange chromosome segregation.

Authors:  R S Rasooly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Meiotic development in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Doris Y Lui; Monica P Colaiácovo
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  A recombination survey using microsatellites: the O chromosome of Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  Cinta Pegueroles; Pedro A Araúz; Marta Pascual; Francesc Mestres
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 8.  Catch and release: how do kinetochores hook the right microtubules during mitosis?

Authors:  Krishna K Sarangapani; Charles L Asbury
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  A direct measurement of crossing over in human prophase oocytes.

Authors:  R Scott Hawley
Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep       Date:  2009-11-16

10.  Differences in crossover frequency and distribution among three sibling species of Drosophila.

Authors:  J R True; J M Mercer; C C Laurie
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.