Literature DB >> 1907236

Differential mechanisms governing segregation of a univalent in oocytes and spermatocytes of Drosophila melanogaster.

J Puro1.   

Abstract

In tricomplex heterozygotes in Drosophila melanogaster three metacentric autosomes (the TRI chromosomes) appear as a trivalent in meiosis while one autosome consisting of two homologous arms attached to the same centromere (a compound) behaves as an obligatory univalent. Cytological analysis of meiosis of tri-complex heterozygotes indicates that in oocytes the univalent compound behaves non-independently in relation to segregation of the trivalent. The compound is distributed preferentially to the same pole as one TRI chromosome. In spermatocytes the compound is distributed at random. In some oocytes the directed segregation is shown to be due to a disjunctional interaction between the compound and one partner of the trivalent at the same time as the other two chromosomes of the trivalent are separating from each other. The basic difference between the segregational mechanisms in the two sexes is discussed with a review of evidence indicating that in males segregation is determined by physical linkage that produces a stable orientation of the homologues at metaphase I. On the other hand, both genetic and cytological evidence indicate that in females a physical linkage (a chiasma) is non-essential for maintenance of co-orientation and stability after the onset of prometaphase. Genetic and cytological evidence support the hypothesis that disjunction is predetermined by non-random arrangement of the centromeric regions of chromosomes in the chromocentre - a suprachromosomal organization characteristic of maturing oocytes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1907236     DOI: 10.1007/bf00360529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  32 in total

1.  Cytological evidence for procentric synapsis of meiotic chromosomes in female Drosophila melanogaster. The behaviour of an extra Y chromosome.

Authors:  L Dävring; M Sunner
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE DISTRIBUTIVE PAIRING HYPOTHESIS IN DROSOPHILA.

Authors:  E NOVITSKI
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Chromosome segregation mechanisms.

Authors:  R B Nicklas
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Co-orientation stability by physical tension: A demonstration with experimentally interlocked bivalents.

Authors:  S A Henderson; C A Koch
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Kinetochore microtubules and chromosome movement during prometaphase in Drosophila melanogaster spermatocytes studied in life and with the electron microscope.

Authors:  K Church; H P Lin
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Cytological evidence for a chromocenter in Drosophila melanogaster oocytes.

Authors:  S Nokkala; J Puro
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 3.271

7.  Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. IV. The conjunctive mechanism of the XY bivalent.

Authors:  J G Ault; H P Lin; K Church
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Tricomplex, a new type of autosome complement in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Puro
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 3.271

9.  A kinesin-like protein required for distributive chromosome segregation in Drosophila.

Authors:  P Zhang; B A Knowles; L S Goldstein; R S Hawley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-09-21       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. II. The prometaphase-I kinetochore microtubule bundle and kinetochore orientation in males.

Authors:  K Church; H P Lin
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  6 in total

1.  The Drosophila wispy gene is required for RNA localization and other microtubule-based events of meiosis and early embryogenesis.

Authors:  A E Brent; A MacQueen; T Hazelrigg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Partner choice in heterologous chromosome segregation of the Y chromosome in competitive situations in the oocyte of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P Portin
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  The Ketel(D) dominant-negative mutations identify maternal function of the Drosophila importin-beta gene required for cleavage nuclei formation.

Authors:  L Tirián; J Puro; M Erdélyi; I Boros; B Papp; M Lippai; J Szabad
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Horka, a dominant mutation of Drosophila, induces nondisjunction and, through paternal effect, chromosome loss and genetic mosaics.

Authors:  J Szabad; E Máthé; J Puro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Meiotic spindle assembly in Drosophila females: behavior of nonexchange chromosomes and the effects of mutations in the nod kinesin-like protein.

Authors:  W E Theurkauf; R S Hawley
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 10.539

6.  Spindle dynamics during meiosis in Drosophila oocytes.

Authors:  S A Endow; D J Komma
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1997-06-16       Impact factor: 10.539

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.