Literature DB >> 441731

The oilbird: hearing and echolocation.

M Konishi, E I Knudsen.   

Abstract

Oilbirds can navigate in total darkness by echolocation. The sound energy in their sonar cries is unevenly distributed over the range from about 1 to 15 kilohertz, with a dominant frequency range of 1.5 to 2.5 kilohertz. This corresponds to the most sensitive range of their hearing as determined by neurophysiological methods. Behavioral tests in their home cave indicate that the smallest object avoided by this is a disk 20 centimeters in diameter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 441731     DOI: 10.1126/science.441731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  12 in total

1.  Discovering your inner bat: echo-acoustic target ranging in humans.

Authors:  Sven Schörnich; Andreas Nagy; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-23

Review 2.  Click-based echolocation in bats: not so primitive after all.

Authors:  Yossi Yovel; Maya Geva-Sagiv; Nachum Ulanovsky
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Variable asymmetry and resonance in the avian vocal tract: a structural basis for individually distinct vocalizations.

Authors:  R A Suthers
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Bigger brains or bigger nuclei? Regulating the size of auditory structures in birds.

Authors:  M Fabiana Kubke; Dino P Massoglia; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 1.808

5.  The eyes of oilbirds (Steatornis caripensis): pushing at the limits of sensitivity.

Authors:  Graham Martin; Luz Marina Rojas; Yleana Ramírez; Raymond McNeil
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-01-09

6.  Structure and possible functions of constant-frequency calls in Ariopsis seemanni (Osteichthyes, Ariidae).

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Jochen Schulz; Jörg Hartung; Karl-Heinz Esser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Range-dependent flexibility in the acoustic field of view of echolocating porpoises (Phocoena phocoena).

Authors:  Danuta M Wisniewska; John M Ratcliffe; Kristian Beedholm; Christian B Christensen; Mark Johnson; Jens C Koblitz; Magnus Wahlberg; Peter T Madsen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Probing the natural scene by echolocation in bats.

Authors:  Cynthia F Moss; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Echolocation in Oilbirds and swiftlets.

Authors:  Signe Brinkløv; M Brock Fenton; John M Ratcliffe
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Perception of silent and motionless prey on vegetation by echolocation in the gleaning bat Micronycteris microtis.

Authors:  Inga Geipel; Kirsten Jung; Elisabeth K V Kalko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.