Literature DB >> 429628

Contrast--detail--dose analysis of six different computed tomographic scanners.

G Cohen.   

Abstract

Low-contrast visibility of various rotate-translate, rotating detector, and stationary detector computed tomogrphy (CT) scanners is measured at contrasts ranging from 0.3 to 3% using a phantom based on the partial volume of water and polystyrene. The results are plotted on log-log curves, as a function of entrance dose, to provide a family of contrast (C)--detail (d)--dose (D) visibility curves. The transition region, approximately 1 to 10% contrast, depends on modulation transfer function (MTF), contrast, and the dose (noise), while the noise region, less than or equal to 1% contrast, is independent of MTF. The slopes of the curves in the noise region are consistent with a value of -1, as opposed to a theoretically expected value of -3/2 for ideal CT noise. Relative dose efficiency of various scanners is examined by plotting CdD(1/2) versus contrast for both peak dose (Dp) and summation dose (D sigma). The rotating detector systems are shown to be, on the average (at 0.5% contrast), 3.4 (Dp) and 4 (D sigma) times more dose efficient than the stationary array system examined, and 2.4 (Dp) and 3.2 (D sigma) times more efficient than the rotate-translate units examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 429628     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-197904000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  5 in total

1.  Dose and detectability for a cone-beam C-arm CT system revisited.

Authors:  Arundhuti Ganguly; Sungwon Yoon; Rebecca Fahrig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Characterizing accuracy of total hemoglobin recovery using contrast-detail analysis in 3D image-guided near infrared spectroscopy with the boundary element method.

Authors:  Hamid R Ghadyani; Subhadra Srinivasan; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Agarose-based Tissue Mimicking Optical Phantoms for Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Afrina Mustari; Izumi Nishidate; Md Abdul Wares; Takaaki Maeda; Satoko Kawauchi; Shunichi Sato; Manabu Sato; Yoshihisa Aizu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 4.  Radiologic and near-infrared/optical spectroscopic imaging: where is the synergy?

Authors:  Brian W Pogue; Frederic Leblond; Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Introduction: feature issue on phantoms for the performance evaluation and validation of optical medical imaging devices.

Authors:  Jeeseong Hwang; Jessica C Ramella-Roman; Robert Nordstrom
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.732

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.