Literature DB >> 426559

Assessment of biopsy techniques and histopathologic interpretations of primary cutaneous malignant melanoma.

D F Roses, A B Ackerman, M N Harris, G R Weinhouse, S L Gumport.   

Abstract

The biopsy techniques utilized for diagnosis in 1,161 patients with primary cutaneous malignant melanoma treated at the New York University Medical Center were reviewed. Eight hundred sixty-four (74%) biopsies were of the excisional type and 269 (23%) were incisional. Twenty-eight biopsies (3%) could not be assessed. Two hundred fifty-two consecutive patients referred for treatment of malignant melanoma to the authors for the last three years were studied to determine whether standard techniques of biopsy and uniform criteria for histopathologic diagnosis and staging were being utilized. One hundred forty-nine of these patients (59%) had total excisional biopsies of their lesions and 103 (41%) had incisional biopsies. Of the latter group, 66 (64%) were for lesions less than 2 cm in diameter and were situated in areas other than the face. The biopsy specimens obtained from 123 patients were reviewed by at least one other pathologist as well as our own (A.B.A.). For these 123 patients a difference of histologic diagnosis between pathologists occurred in 11 (9%). In 58 (47%) there was a discrepancy in assignment of Clark levels or a failure to assess Clark levels. Tumor thicknesses as measured by Breslow were read in only 22 (18%) of these 123 patients. The inadequacies of many of the biopsy specimens and discrepancies in histopathologic interpretation indicate that acceptable biopsy techniques and reproducible diagnostic criteria have not yet been generally adapted for primary cutaneous malignant melanomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 426559      PMCID: PMC1397091          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-197903000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  16 in total

1.  STAGING OF MALIGNANT MELANOMAS BY DEPTH OF INVASION; A PROPOSED INDEX TO PROGNOSIS.

Authors:  J H MEHNERT; J L HEARD
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1965-08       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Inefficacy of immediate node dissection in stage 1 melanoma of the limbs.

Authors:  U Veronesi; J Adamus; D C Bandiera; I O Brennhovd; E Caceres; N Cascinelli; F Claudio; R L Ikonopisov; V V Javorskj; S Kirov; A Kulakowski; J Lacoub; F Lejeune; Z Mechl; A Morabito; I Rodé; S Sergeev; E van Slooten; K Szcygiel; N N Trapeznikov
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-09-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  A rational approach to the surgical management of melanoma.

Authors:  E C Holmes; H S Moseley; D L Morton; W Clark; D Robinson; M M Urist
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Results of treatment of 269 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma: a five-year prospective study.

Authors:  T K Gupta
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Total excision biopsy for primary malignant melanoma.

Authors:  M N Harris; S L Gumport
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1973-10-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Optimal size of resection margin for thin cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  A Breslow; S D Macht
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1977-11

7.  Moles and malignant melanoma: terminology and CLASSIFICATION.

Authors: 
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1967-01-21       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Histologic criteria for the diagnosis of superficial spreading malignant melanoma: formulated on the basis of proven metastatic lesions.

Authors:  N M Price; A M Rywlin; A B Ackerman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Benign juvenile melanoma (Spitz nevus) vs. superficial spreading malignant melanoma: criteria for histologic differentiation.

Authors:  R C Connors; M D Chalet; A B Ackerman
Journal:  J Dermatol Surg       Date:  1975-06

10.  Comparison of the classification by microscopic level (stage) of malignant melanoma by three independent groups of pathologists.

Authors:  S C Suffin; J Waisman; W H Clark; D L Morton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  6 in total

1.  Shave biopsy is a safe and accurate method for the initial evaluation of melanoma.

Authors:  Jonathan S Zager; Steven N Hochwald; Suroosh S Marzban; Rony Francois; Kimberly M Law; Ashley H Davis; Jane L Messina; Vladimir Vincek; Christina Mitchell; Ann Church; Edward M Copeland; Vernon K Sondak; Stephen R Grobmyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Biopsy procedures, primary wide excisional surgery and long term prognosis in primary clinical stage I invasive cutaneous malignant melanoma.

Authors:  R W Griffiths; J C Briggs
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Local and in-transit metastases following definitive excision for primary cutaneous malignant melanoma.

Authors:  D F Roses; M N Harris; D Rigel; Z Carrey; R Friedman; A W Kopf
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of early melanoma. The importance of depth of microinvasion.

Authors:  Y T Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Selective surgical management of cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  D F Roses; M N Harris; I Grunberger; S L Gumport
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Re-biopsy of partially sampled thin melanoma impacts sentinel lymph node sampling as well as surgical margins.

Authors:  Evan S Weitman; Matthew C Perez; Daniel Lee; Youngchul Kim; William Fulp; Vernon K Sondak; Amod A Sarnaik; Ricardo J Gonzalez; Carl W Cruse; Jane L Messina; Jonathan S Zager
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2019-04-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.