Literature DB >> 42450

Action of shear on enzymes: studies with alcohol dehydrogenase.

C R Thomas, A W Nienow, P Dunnill.   

Abstract

Yeast alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) solutions (approximately 1 mg/ml, pH 7) were sheared in a coaxial cylindrical viscometer. This was fitted with a lid sealing the contents from the atmosphere and preventing evaporation. At 30 degrees C after a total of 5 hr intermittent shearing at 683 sec-1 no losses of activity were observed. No losses were found after 5 hr continuous shearing and in a no-shear control. At 40 degrees C and 683 sec-1 there were only small activity losses in 5 hr. Shearing at 3440 sec-1 no measurable losses of activity were found with a 1.03 mg/ml solution in 5 hr at 30 degrees C, a 1.03 mg/ml solution in 8 hr at 5 degrees C, and with a 3.89 mg/ml solution in 3 hr at 5 degrees C. In all these cases, however, a white precipitate formed that was not observed in zero shear control experiments. The sheared 3.89 mg/ml solution was clarified by centrifugation. It was shown that there were no ADH aggregates in the supernatant and that the precipitate was less than 2% of the original protein. At 30 degrees C under adverse pH conditions (pH 8.8) there was no significant difference in activity losses of an approximately 1 mg/ml solution sheared at 65 and 744 sec-1. An approximately 0.5 mg/ml ADH solution, pH 7, was agitated in a small reactor with no free air-liquid interface. Peak shear rates near the impeller were estimated to be about 9000 sec-1. Only a small decrease in specific activity was observed until over 15 hr total running at 5 degrees C.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 42450     DOI: 10.1002/bit.260211208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  9 in total

1.  Rheo-NMR studies of an enzymatic reaction: evidence of a shear-stable macromolecular system.

Authors:  Patrick J B Edwards; Motoko Kakubayashi; Robin Dykstra; Steven M Pascal; Martin A K Williams
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Do protein molecules unfold in a simple shear flow?

Authors:  Juan Jaspe; Stephen J Hagen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Irreversible inactivation of interleukin 2 in a pump-based delivery environment.

Authors:  S T Tzannis; W J Hrushesky; P A Wood; T M Przybycien
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Protein structural dynamics at the gas/water interface examined by hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Yiming Xiao; Lars Konermann
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Charge-mediated Fab-Fc interactions in an IgG1 antibody induce reversible self-association, cluster formation, and elevated viscosity.

Authors:  Jayant Arora; Yue Hu; Reza Esfandiary; Hasige A Sathish; Steven M Bishop; Sangeeta B Joshi; C Russell Middaugh; David B Volkin; David D Weis
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 5.857

6.  Response of a concentrated monoclonal antibody formulation to high shear.

Authors:  Jared S Bee; Jennifer L Stevenson; Bhavya Mehta; Juraj Svitel; Joey Pollastrini; Robert Platz; Erwin Freund; John F Carpenter; Theodore W Randolph
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Inducing protein aggregation by extensional flow.

Authors:  John Dobson; Amit Kumar; Leon F Willis; Roman Tuma; Daniel R Higazi; Richard Turner; David C Lowe; Alison E Ashcroft; Sheena E Radford; Nikil Kapur; David J Brockwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry reveals protein interfaces and distant dynamic coupling effects during the reversible self-association of an IgG1 monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  Jayant Arora; John M Hickey; Ranajoy Majumdar; Reza Esfandiary; Steven M Bishop; Hardeep S Samra; C Russell Middaugh; David D Weis; David B Volkin
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 9.  Considerations when Measuring Biocatalyst Performance.

Authors:  Mafalda Dias Gomes; John M Woodley
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 4.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.