Literature DB >> 4197835

Electrical properties of toad sartorius muscle fibres in summer and winter.

A F Dulhunty, P W Gage.   

Abstract

1. The area and circumference of surface fibres of sartorius muscles were measured from photomicrographs of frozen sections of whole muscles, and compared with the values obtained assuming a circular cross-section. The latter assumption gave an over-estimate of the mean area of 28%, but only a 2% over-estimate of the circumference. In isolated, single fibres, the assumption gave over-estimates of 25 and 6%, of area and circumference respectively.2. The passive electrical properties of fibres were different in summer and winter. The mean internal resistivity, membrane resistance and membrane capacitance were 147 Omega.cm, 7.6 kOmega.cm(2) and 4 muF/cm(2) in summer, and 194 Omega.cm, 3.9 kOmega.cm(2) and 6.7 muF/cm(2) in winter, in fibres of comparable diameters in situ. In single fibres in summer, the mean values were 120 Omega.cm, 8.6 kOmega.cm(2) and 3.6 muF/cm(2).3. In glycerol-treated fibres the mean specific membrane capacitance was 1.0 muF/cm(2) in summer and 2.0 muF/cm(2) in winter. The internal resistivity and specific membrane resistance were 167 Omega.cm and 8.9 kOmega.cm(2) in summer, and 232 Omega.cm and 3.9 kOmega.cm(2) in winter.4. Early after-depolarizations were recorded in glycerol-treated fibres which had a low membrane capacitance, did not twitch and showed little ;creep'. Electron micrographs of glycerol-treated fibres showed disruption of the transverse tubular system and sarcoplasmic reticulum.5. After exposure of muscles to 400 mM urea or acetamide for 1 hr, muscle fibres did not twitch and had a reduced membrane capacitance in Ringer solution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1973        PMID: 4197835      PMCID: PMC1350619          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  22 in total

1.  The influence of potassium and chloride ions on the membrane potential of single muscle fibres.

Authors:  A L HODGKIN; P HOROWICZ
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1959-10       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  An analysis of the end-plate potential recorded with an intracellular electrode.

Authors:  P FATT; B KATZ
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1951-11-28       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Observations on "detubulated" muscle fibres.

Authors:  J Zachar; D Zacharova; R H Adrian
Journal:  Nat New Biol       Date:  1972-10-04

4.  The incorporation of linoleic acid into the tissues of growing steers offered a dietary supplement of formaldehyde-treated casein-safflower oil.

Authors:  G J Faichney; H L Davies; T W Scott; L J Cook
Journal:  Aust J Biol Sci       Date:  1972-02

5.  Effect of diameter on the electrical constants of frog skeletal muscle fibres.

Authors:  S Nakajima; A L Hodgkin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-09-05       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Capacitance of the surface and transverse tubular membrane of frog sartorius muscle fibers.

Authors:  P W Gage; R S Eisenberg
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  The effect of high K+ solutions and fatty acid substrates on metabolic pathways in toad heart.

Authors:  S E Freeman; D G Satchell; C S Chang; W S Gay
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol       Date:  1968-07

8.  Anion permeability of frog skeletal muscle.

Authors:  L E Moore
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Potassium conductance changes in skeletal muscle and the potassium concentration in the transverse tubules.

Authors:  W Almers
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Potassium exchange and afterpotentials in frog sartorius muscles treated with glycerol.

Authors:  E G Henderson
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  A synthetic strand of cardiac muscle: its passive electrical properties.

Authors:  M Lieberman; T Sawanobori; J M Kootsey; E A Johnson
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  The relative contributions of the folds and caveolae to the surface membrane of frog skeletal muscle fibres at different sarcomere lengths.

Authors:  A F Dulhunty; C Franzini-Armstrong
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The action of Ca2+ , Mg2+ and H+ on the contraction threshold of frog skeletal muscle: Evidence for surface charges controlling electro-mechanical coupling.

Authors:  M Dörrscheidt-Käfer
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1976-03-11       Impact factor: 3.657

4.  Influence of activity on the passive electrical properties of denervated soleus muscle fibres in the rat.

Authors:  R H Westgaard
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Xenopus exhibits seasonal variation in retinotectal latency but not tecto-isthmo-tectal latency.

Authors:  W J Scherer; S B Udin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Effects of external calcium concentration and pH on charge movement in frog skeletal muscle.

Authors:  H H Shlevin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  The action of D600 on frog skeletal muscle: facilitation of excitation-contraction coupling.

Authors:  M Dörrscheidt-Käfer
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1977-07-19       Impact factor: 3.657

8.  The passive electrical properties of frog skeletal muscle fibres at different sarcomere lengths.

Authors:  A F Dulhunty; C Franzini-Armstrong
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Effects of some aliphatic alcohols on the conductance change caused by a quantum of acetylcholine at the toad end-plate.

Authors:  P W Gage; R N McBurney; G T Schneider
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Seasonal changes in the properties of frog. End-plate channels.

Authors:  C A Lewis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.