Literature DB >> 415624

Comparative educational approaches to screening for colorectal cancer.

T W Elwood, A Erickson, S Lieberman.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the public's willingness to perform the do-it-yourself Hemoccult Test for colon-rectum cancer and to assess the relative effectiveness of alternative means of persuading people to do the test. American Cancer Society volunteers in four different part of the country contacted a total of 11,115 members of the American Association of Retired Persons, using five methods that differed in the extent of personal and impersonal contact involved. Other variables such as inclusion of postage and dietary restrictions were studied and cost efficiencies were estimated. The Group Meeting Method was the most effective personal distribution method. The Selective Mail-Out Method was the most effective impersonal method. The return rate was higher when postage was provided. Dietary restrictions did not markedly reduce participation. Including digital examinations did not affect the return rate. The findings suggest that the Hemoccult Test has the potential of reaching a significant proportion of the nation's older population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 415624      PMCID: PMC1653860          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.68.2.135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  9 in total

1.  Telephone outreach to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban minority population.

Authors:  Charles E Basch; Randi L Wolf; Corey H Brouse; Celia Shmukler; Alfred Neugut; Lawrence T DeCarlo; Steven Shea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  What do family practice residents do in prevention and counselling?

Authors:  M Klein; R Bluman; D Tannenbaum
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Symposium: Screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F Macrae; G Ekelund; B P Robra; R Gnauck; H Ribet; J Escourrou; J H Bond; N C Armitage; J B Simon
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Occult blood screening of Canadians: wise or unwise?

Authors:  J B Simon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1985-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  The pros and cons of fecal occult blood testing for colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  J B Simon
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.264

6.  A simple strategy to improve patient adherence to outpatient fecal occult blood testing.

Authors:  J D Freedman; C K Mitchell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  W B Applegate; M H Spector
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1981

8.  Compliance with fecal occult blood testing: the role of restrictive diets.

Authors:  A Joseph
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura Camilloni; Eliana Ferroni; Beatriz Jimenez Cendales; Annamaria Pezzarossi; Giacomo Furnari; Piero Borgia; Gabriella Guasticchi; Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.