Literature DB >> 21289718

What do family practice residents do in prevention and counselling?

M Klein, R Bluman, D Tannenbaum.   

Abstract

A study was undertaken to measure what family practice residents do in prevention and counselling during routine check-ups on adults. A series of Health Monitoring and Promotion (HMP) measures were used to assess the content of the check-up. The residents were given a sheet of guidelines in an attempt to augment performance of the HMP measures. Using one-way glass, 353 patient encounters were observed. Analysis of 171 encounters before and 182 encounters after the introduction of the guidelines showed that the guidelines positively influenced the residents' behavior by increasing the number of HMP measures performed. Preventive items of a physical nature were carried out 61.2% of the time before the introduction of the guidelines and 69.7% after, with more pronounced improvement when dealing with the 18-39 age group and among men. Similar changes occurred on historical items of a preventive type, but history-taking from women was more positively influenced. Preventive counselling was carried out 20% of the time and was uninfluenced by the guidelines. There was a high level of breast and testicle examination, but a low level of teaching self-examination. Counselling on retirement, lifestyle, 'passages' and similar issues was uninfluenced by the instrument.

Entities:  

Year:  1981        PMID: 21289718      PMCID: PMC2305942     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  21 in total

Review 1.  A critical review of periodic health screening using specific screening criteria. 3. Selected diseases of the genitourinary system.

Authors:  P S Frame; S J Carlson
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  A critical review of periodic health screening using specific screening criteria. Part 2: Selected endocrine, metabolic and gastrointestinal diseases.

Authors:  P S Frame; S J Carlson
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 0.493

3.  A critical review of periodic health screening using specific screening criteria. Part 1: Selected diseases of respiratory, cardiovascular, and central nervous systems.

Authors:  P S Frame; S J Carlson
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 4.  Screening in pediatric practice.

Authors:  E N Bailey; P S Kiehl; D S Akram; H H Loughlin; T J Metcalf; R Jain; J M Perrin
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 3.278

5.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of cytologic screening for cervical cancer. I. Incidence and mortality trends in relation to screening.

Authors:  L Dickinson; M E Mussey; E H Soule; L T Kurland
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of cytologic screening for cervical cancer. II. Survival parameters before and after inception of screening.

Authors:  L Dickinson; M E Mussey; L T Kurland
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  The periodic health examination for the adult. Waste or wisdom?

Authors:  T L Delbanco
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 2.907

8.  Periodic health examinations. Why? What? When? How?

Authors:  M F Collen
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 2.907

9.  The lifetime health-monitoring program. A practical approach to preventive medicine.

Authors:  L Breslow; A R Somers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-03-17       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Unanswered questions about the periodic health examination.

Authors:  W O Spitzer; B P Brown
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.