Literature DB >> 414592

Number of projections in mammography: influence on detection of breast disease.

I Andersson, J Hildell, A Mühlow, H Pettersson.   

Abstract

A total of 491 cases of breast cancer were reviewed to evaluate the diagnostic importance of the three standard projections; craniocaudal, mediolateral, and oblique. With only one projection, 90% of the malignancies would have been detected; with two and three projections the percentages rose to 94% and 95%, respectively. Nonvisualization was due to either juxtathoracic position of the tumor or superimposition of dense tissues. A relation was found between the position of a juxtathoracic tumor and the projection in which it was visualized. The mean diameter of tumors not visible due to superimposition of dense tissues was smaller than that of the whole material. In breast screening programs, use of two projections, the oblique and craniocaudal, is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 414592     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.130.2.349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  10 in total

1.  A comparative audit of prevalent, incident and interval cancers in the Avon breast screening programme.

Authors:  P A Sylvester; M N Vipond; E Kutt; J D Davies; A J Webb; J R Farndon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  One and two view mammography in breast cancer. Many subjects in trial were not asked for consent.

Authors:  H Thornton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-02-24

3.  What should be done about interval breast cancers?

Authors:  S Field; M J Michell; M G Wallis; A R Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-28

4.  A program for breast cancer detection.

Authors:  G A Patchen; I Schiller
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1982-03

5.  Film-screen mammography: comparison of views.

Authors:  L W Bassett; D H Bunnell; R H Gold; R Jahanshahi
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial.

Authors:  I Andersson; K Aspegren; L Janzon; T Landberg; K Lindholm; F Linell; O Ljungberg; J Ranstam; B Sigfússon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-15

7.  Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings.

Authors:  Ingvar Andersson; Debra M Ikeda; Sophia Zackrisson; Mark Ruschin; Tony Svahn; Pontus Timberg; Anders Tingberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Is the three year breast screening interval too long? Occurrence of interval cancers in NHS breast screening programme's north western region.

Authors:  C B Woodman; A G Threlfall; C R Boggis; P Prior
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-28

9.  Computer-aided detection of breast carcinoma in standard mammographic projections with digital mammography.

Authors:  Stamatia Destounis; Sarah Hanson; Renee Morgan; Philip Murphy; Patricia Somerville; Posy Seifert; Valerie Andolina; Andrea Arieno; Melissa Skolny; Wende Logan-Young
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  UKCCCR multicentre randomised controlled trial of one and two view mammography in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  N J Wald; P Murphy; P Major; C Parkes; J Townsend; C Frost
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-11-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.