Literature DB >> 4085594

Afferent control of human stance and gait: evidence for blocking of group I afferents during gait.

V Dietz, J Quintern, W Berger.   

Abstract

The cerebral potentials (c.p.) evoked by electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve during stance and in the various phases of gait of normal subjects were compared with the c.p. and leg muscle e.m.g. responses evoked by perturbations of stance and gait. Over the whole step cycle of gait the c.p. evoked by an electrical stimulus were of smaller amplitude (3 microV and 9 microV, respectively) than that seen in the stance condition, and appeared with a longer latency (mean times to first positive peak: 63 and 43 ms, respectively). When the electrical stimulus was applied during stance after ischaemic blockade of group I afferents, the c.p. were similar to those evoked during gait. The c.p. evoked by perturbations were larger in amplitude than those produced by the electrical stimulus, but similar in latencies in both gait and stance (mean 26 microV and 40 microV; 65 ms and 42 ms, respectively) and configurations. The large gastrocnemius e.m.g. responses evoked by the stance and gait perturbations arose with a latency of 65 to 70 ms. Only in the stance condition was a smaller, shorter latency (40 ms) response seen. It is concluded that during gait the signals of group I afferents are blocked at both segmental and supraspinal levels which was tested by tibial nerve stimulation. It is suggested that the e.m.g. responses induced in the leg by gait perturbations are evoked by group II afferents and mediated via a spinal pathway. The c.p. evoked during gait most probably reflect the processing of this group II input by supraspinal motor centres for the coordination of widespread arm and trunk muscle activation, necessary to restablish body equilibrium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4085594     DOI: 10.1007/BF00235630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  29 in total

1.  Involuntary activity in biceps following the sudden application of velocity to the abducted forearm.

Authors:  P H HAMMOND
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1955-02-28       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Stretch reflex and servo action in a variety of human muscles.

Authors:  C D Marsden; P A Merton; H B Morton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Presynaptic inhibition in the vertebrate central nervous system.

Authors:  R F Schmidt
Journal:  Ergeb Physiol       Date:  1971

4.  Input from muscle and cutaneous nerves of the hand and forearm to neurones of the precentral gyrus of baboons and monkeys.

Authors:  M Wiesendanger
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Corrective reactions to stumbling in man: neuronal co-ordination of bilateral leg muscle activity during gait.

Authors:  W Berger; V Dietz; J Quintern
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Cerebral evoked potentials associated with the compensatory reactions following stance and gait perturbation.

Authors:  V Dietz; J Quintern; W Berger
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1984-09-07       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  'Long-loop' reflexes can be obtained in spinal monkeys.

Authors:  D J Tracey; B Walmsley; J Brinkman
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1980-05-15       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Neuronal mechanisms of human locomotion.

Authors:  V Dietz; D Schmidtbleicher; J Noth
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Stretch reflexes of triceps surae in normal man.

Authors:  A Berardelli; M Hallett; C Kaufman; E Fine; W Berenberg; S R Simon
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Gating of somatosensory evoked potentials during different kinds of movement in man.

Authors:  D N Rushton; J C Rothwell; M D Craggs
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  38 in total

1.  Somatosensory evoked potentials during natural and learning rearrangements of posture accompanied by limb elevation in dogs.

Authors:  T Gavrilenko; A G Frolov; M E Ioffe; G N Ganchev; A V Aleksandrov; O G Pavlova
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec

2.  Dissociation of muscle and cortical response scaling to balance perturbation acceleration.

Authors:  Aiden M Payne; Greg Hajcak; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Effects of leg muscle tendon vibration on group Ia and group II reflex responses to stance perturbation in humans.

Authors:  Marco Bove; Antonio Nardone; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Phase-dependent reversal of reflexly induced movements during human gait.

Authors:  J Duysens; A A Tax; M Trippel; V Dietz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The influence of a reduced plantar support surface area on the compensatory reactions to a forward fall.

Authors:  M C Do; A Roby-Brami
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Neurophysiological evaluation of sensorimotor functions of the leg: comparison of evoked cortical potentials following electrical and mechanical stimulation, long-latency muscle responses, and transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  H Ackermann; C Thomas; B Guschlbauer; J Dichgans
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Cortical responses associated with predictable and unpredictable compensatory balance reactions.

Authors:  Allan L Adkin; Sylvia Quant; Brian E Maki; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Specific modulation of the Hoffmann reflex cutaneous facilitation during a reaction-time task.

Authors:  C Demairé; J Honoré; J Le Bizec; J M Coquery
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Changes in corticospinal excitability following adaptive modification to human walking.

Authors:  J R Zabukovec; L A Boyd; M A Linsdell; T Lam
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Gamma somatosensory cortical oscillations are attenuated during the stance phase of human walking.

Authors:  Sarah Baker; Mike Trevarrow; James Gehringer; Hannah Bergwell; David Arpin; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Tony W Wilson; Max J Kurz
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.