Literature DB >> 4074418

Comparative measurements of left ventricular ejection time by mechano-, echo- and electrical impedance cardiography.

H C Stern, G K Wolf, G G Belz.   

Abstract

Several electrical impedance cardiographic and mechanocardiographic methods for assessing left ventricular ejection time (LVET) were compared with the aortic valve LVET echogram to determine whether values from an impedance method allow an exact measurement of LVET. From seven healthy subjects, tracings of signals from the ECG, phonocardiogram, carotid pulse, and electrical impedance cardiography were inscribed simultaneously with M-mode aortic valve echograms which recorded the separation and closure of the aortic valves. LVETs were measured from each cycle according to several established techniques. To yield variations in the LVET, heart rate was increased using injections of atropine 0.25 mg i.v. every 10 min until the rate reached 100 to 110 beats/min. Using biometrical methods with different sensitivities to extreme values, individual regression analyses compared the LVET from carotid and from impedance tracings to the "real" value measured from the echogram. The results showed the carotid pulse values underestimate and the conventional impedance methods over- and underestimate the real LVET. A modified approach identified LVET onset at the crossing of the dZ/dt line from the impedance cardiogram with baseline or, when a presystolic wave appeared at higher heart rates, the first turning point in the dZ/dt curve before this wave, and the LVET termination as the initial signal from the second heart sound. This combination of impedance cardiography and phonocardiography offers a precise estimation of LVET in noninvasive cardiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4074418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung        ISSN: 0004-4172


  10 in total

1.  Differential cardiovascular effects of propranolol, atenolol, and pindolol measured by impedance cardiography.

Authors:  S H Thomas; R C Cooper; M Ekwuru; S Fletcher; J Gilbody; T S Husseyin; M Ishaque; R Jagathesan; G Reddy; S E Smith
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Noninvasive assessment of the inodilator action of amrinone in healthy man.

Authors:  C de Mey; D Enterling; G Hanft
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Automatic analysis of pre-ejection period during sleep using impedance cardiogram.

Authors:  Mohamad Forouzanfar; Fiona C Baker; Ian M Colrain; Aimée Goldstone; Massimiliano de Zambotti
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Pitfalls and limitations in the use of impedance cardiography.

Authors:  C de Mey; G G Belz
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1989-01

5.  Toward a better noninvasive assessment of preejection period: A novel automatic algorithm for B-point detection and correction on thoracic impedance cardiogram.

Authors:  Mohamad Forouzanfar; Fiona C Baker; Massimiliano de Zambotti; Corey McCall; Laurent Giovangrandi; Gregory T A Kovacs
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 6.  Systolic time intervals in clinical pharmacology.

Authors:  Q Li; G G Belz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Disagreement between standard transthoracic impedance cardiography and the automated transthoracic electrical bioimpedance method in estimating the cardiovascular responses to phenylephrine and isoprenaline in healthy man.

Authors:  C De Mey; D Enterling
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Impedance cardiography using the Sramek-Bernstein method: accuracy and variability at rest and during exercise.

Authors:  S H Thomas
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Comparison of the cardiovascular effects of nifedipine and nicardipine in the presence of atenolol.

Authors:  S H Thomas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Comparison of Different Methods for Estimating Cardiac Timings: A Comprehensive Multimodal Echocardiography Investigation.

Authors:  Parastoo Dehkordi; Farzad Khosrow-Khavar; Marco Di Rienzo; Omer T Inan; Samuel E Schmidt; Andrew P Blaber; Kasper Sørensen; Johannes J Struijk; Vahid Zakeri; Prospero Lombardi; Md Mobashir H Shandhi; Mojtaba Borairi; John M Zanetti; Kouhyar Tavakolian
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 4.566

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.