Literature DB >> 4072012

Effect of pupil size on steady state accommodation.

P A Ward, W N Charman.   

Abstract

Experiments are described in which monocular accommodation response/stimulus curves were measured with Snellen targets over the stimulus range from +1.0 to -5.0 D, using artificial pupils with diameters of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 mm and a constant retinal illuminance of 600 td. The results agree with those of earlier authors in showing a diminished response with smaller pupils. The slopes of the quasi-linear central portions of the response/stimulus curves are well described in terms of a geometrical optical approximation in which the accommodation system works to produce a retinal blur circle whose diameter is a linear function of the dioptric difference between the magnitudes of the stimulus and the accommodative resting state, this blur circle diameter being independent of the pupil diameter. Further consideration of diffractive effects suggests that contrast changes in the intermediate spatial frequency components (approximately 5 c/deg) of the retinal image may play a dominant role in guiding the response.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4072012     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90047-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Pupil responses to near visual demand during human visual development.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Jingyun Wang; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Does perceptual adaptation to telestereoscopically enhanced depth depend on the recalibration of binocular disparity?

Authors:  S K Fisher; S M Ebenholtz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-08

3.  The accommodative response, refractive error and mental effort: 1. The sympathetic nervous system.

Authors:  M A Bullimore; B Gilmartin
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Determining the accommodative response from wavefront aberrations.

Authors:  Janice Tarrant; Austin Roorda; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Potential signal to accommodation from the Stiles-Crawford effect and ocular monochromatic aberrations.

Authors:  Lawrence R Stark; Philip B Kruger; Frances J Rucker; William H Swanson; Nathan Schmidt; Caitlin Hardy; Hadassa Rutman; Theodore Borgovan; Sean Burke; Mustanser Badar; Raj Shah
Journal:  J Mod Opt       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.464

6.  Retinal image quality during accommodation.

Authors:  Norberto López-Gil; Jesson Martin; Tao Liu; Arthur Bradley; David Díaz-Muñoz; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Accommodation and pupil responses to random-dot stereograms.

Authors:  Rajaraman Suryakumar; Robert Allison
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-04-16

Review 8.  Effect of Phenylephrine on the Accommodative System.

Authors:  José J Esteve-Taboada; Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Paula Bernal-Molina; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; Norberto López-Gil; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Lags and leads of accommodation in humans: Fact or fiction?

Authors:  Vivek Labhishetty; Steven A Cholewiak; Austin Roorda; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Revisiting the impact of phenylephrine hydrochloride on static and dynamic accommodation.

Authors:  Samrat Sarkar; Ali Mohammed Hasnat; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.848

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.