Literature DB >> 4071982

Role of low and high spatial frequencies in the face-selective responses of neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus in the monkey.

E T Rolls, G C Baylis, C M Leonard.   

Abstract

There are neurons in the cortex in the anterior part of the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey with visual responses selective for faces. One aim of the present study was to analyze further the information which leads them to respond, by measuring their responses to parametrically filtered stimuli. The responses of 32 such single neurons were measured to faces which were digitized, lowpass filtered at spatial frequencies of 2, 4, 8,...128 cycles/face, highpass filtered at frequencies of 4, 8,...64 cycles/face, and presented in random sequence using a video framestore. It was found that many of the neurons could respond to blurred images of faces, with a mean frequency at half-maximum amplitude of the neuronal response to the series of lowpass filtered images of faces of 3.3 cycles/face. Almost all the neurons had lowpass cutoff frequencies defined in this way below 8 cycles/face. Many of the neurons could also respond to images of faces in which the only information remaining was a limited amount of high spatial frequency edge information. The mean frequency at half-maximum amplitude of the neuronal response to the series of highpass filtered images of faces was 29.7 cycles/face. Almost all the neurons had highpass cutoff frequencies above 8 cycles/face. Thus, many of the neurons could respond to a lowpass and a highpass filtered image of a face even when these had no spatial frequencies in common. The mean separation between the lowpass and highpass cutoff frequencies was 3.2 octaves. For comparison, face recognition in man can be performed with images which contain only information up to 8 cycles/face, or with highpass filtered images which contain only information down to 8 cycles/face. The response of the neurons was not always a smooth function of frequency, but could decrease as higher frequencies were included in the lowpass filtered images of faces, or as low frequencies were included in the highpass filtered images of faces. This indicates that information in certain frequency bands was able to inhibit these neurons. This was particularly likely to occur for the non-optimal face stimulus for a given neuron, indicating that the selectivity of these neurons to different faces was a combination of the excitation produced by some information in faces and inhibition produced by other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4071982     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90091-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  15 in total

1.  Invariant Visual Object and Face Recognition: Neural and Computational Bases, and a Model, VisNet.

Authors:  Edmund T Rolls
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.380

2.  Continuous transformation learning of translation invariant representations.

Authors:  G Perry; E T Rolls; S M Stringer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Corticothalamic connections of the superior temporal sulcus in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  E H Yeterian; D N Pandya
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Individual differences in FFA activity suggest independent processing at different spatial scales.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; Kim M Curby; Pawel Skudlarski; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  A face-responsive potential recorded from the human scalp.

Authors:  D A Jeffreys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The face-detection effect: configuration enhances detection.

Authors:  D G Purcell; A L Stewart
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-04

7.  Object-centered encoding by face-selective neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey.

Authors:  M E Hasselmo; E T Rolls; G C Baylis; V Nalwa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Size and contrast have only small effects on the responses to faces of neurons in the cortex of the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey.

Authors:  E T Rolls; G C Baylis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Comparative studies on recognition of faces, mimic and gestures in adolescent and middle-aged schizophrenic patients.

Authors:  K Berndl; O J Grüsser; M Martin; H Remschmidt
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci       Date:  1986

10.  Representing the forest before the trees: a global advantage effect in monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Arun P Sripati; Carl R Olson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.