Literature DB >> 4071000

Birth defects and exposure to video display terminals during pregnancy. A Finnish case-referent study.

K Kurppa, P C Holmberg, K Rantala, T Nurminen, L Saxén.   

Abstract

In a test of the widely publicized allegation that exposure to video display terminals causes birth defects, interview forms of mothers of 1 475 children reported consecutively to the Finnish Register of Congenital Malformations to have defects of the central nervous system, orofacial clefts, skeletal defects, or cardiovascular malformations and the forms of the same number of their paired referents were studied. The scrutiny revealed 490 mothers with occupational titles indicating potential exposure to video display terminals. Of the 490, 235 were case mothers and 255 were referents. Then, unaware of the case-referent status, three members of the research team perused the mothers' interview descriptions of workday activities for information indicating exposure to video display terminals. Work with such terminals during the first trimester of pregnancy was ascertained for 111 mothers. Of these, 51 were case mothers and 60 were referents. The comparison of the mothers exposed to video display terminals during the first trimester with those not exposed at all showed a crude odds-ratio point estimate of 0.9 with 95% confidence limits of 0.6 and 1.2. Adjustment for potential confounders by multivariate logistic regression methods did not materially affect the risk estimates. The results did not indicate a teratogenic risk for operators of video display terminals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4071000     DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.2213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health        ISSN: 0355-3140            Impact factor:   5.024


  9 in total

Review 1.  Possible health effects of working with VDUs.

Authors:  U Bergqvist
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1989-04

2.  Cardiovascular malformations and maternal exposure to video display terminals during pregnancy.

Authors:  J Tikkanen; O P Heinonen; K Kurppa; K Rantala
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 3.  Work and pregnancy.

Authors:  A D McDonald
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1988-09

4.  [Pregnancy and professional activity].

Authors:  R Huch
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Advice on Pre-natal Work and Employment.

Authors:  H E Bryant
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Video display terminal use during pregnancy and reproductive outcome--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Parazzini; L Luchini; C La Vecchia; P G Crosignani
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Work with visual display units in pregnancy.

Authors:  A D McDonald; J C McDonald; B Armstrong; N Cherry; A D Nolin; D Robert
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1988-08

8.  Occupational risk factors for congenital heart disease.

Authors:  J Tikkanen; O P Heinonen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 9.  Human adverse reproductive outcomes and electromagnetic field exposures: review of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  G M Shaw; L A Croen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.