Literature DB >> 3415916

Work with visual display units in pregnancy.

A D McDonald1, J C McDonald, B Armstrong, N Cherry, A D Nolin, D Robert.   

Abstract

Data from the Montreal survey on occupational factors in pregnancy were used to test the hypothesis that visual display units (VDUs) constitute a hazard to reproduction. Use of a VDU was recorded in 4712 current and 2164 previous pregnancies of women in full time employment at time of conception. After allowance for seven confounding variables, the risk of spontaneous abortion in current pregnancies relative to all working women was 1.19 (90% CI 1.09-1.30) and in previous pregnancies, 0.97. In an analysis by occupational title, in which 60 occupational groups were aggregated into eight categories according to use of VDUs, the relative risk for spontaneous abortion was 1.06 (90% CI 0.8-1.4) in current pregnancies and 1.01 (90% CI 0.7-1.3) in previous pregnancies. This suggests that the small excess of spontaneous abortions among individual women reporting the use of VDUs in current pregnancies may have been due to recall bias. Relative risks for stillbirth, preterm birth, and low birth weight all had 90% confidence limits which included unity. In an analysis of congenital defects the number of pregnancies was increased to include women who worked 15 or more hours a week. In all but one of nine groups of congenital defect examined confidence limits for the relative risk included unity in both current and previous pregnancies. The relative risks for the renal urinary group of defects were raised in both current (1.84, 90% CI 1.07-3.15) and previous pregnancies (1.66, 90% CI 0.82-3.25). There being no prior reason to suspect a causal link with this type of defect, interpretation remains open to question.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3415916      PMCID: PMC1009643          DOI: 10.1136/oem.45.8.509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ind Med        ISSN: 0007-1072


  11 in total

1.  Prematurity and work in pregnancy.

Authors:  A D McDonald; J C McDonald; B Armstrong; N M Cherry; A D Nolin; D Robert
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1988-01

2.  Fetal death and work in pregnancy.

Authors:  A D McDonald; J C McDonald; B Armstrong; N M Cherry; R Côté; J Lavoie; A D Nolin; D Robert
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1988-03

3.  Physical demands of work and health complaints among women working late in pregnancy.

Authors:  N Cherry
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Video display terminals and health. A technical and medical appraisal of the state of the art.

Authors:  U O Bergqvist
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 5.024

Review 5.  Health implications of exposure to radiofrequency/microwave energies.

Authors:  S M Michaelson
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1982-05

6.  Uses of ecologic analysis in epidemiologic research.

Authors:  H Morgenstern
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Occupation and pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  A D McDonald; J C McDonald; B Armstrong; N Cherry; C Delorme; A D-Nolin; D Robert
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1987-08

8.  Reproductive hazards in the workplace. Development of epidemiologic research.

Authors:  P J Landrigan; J M Melius; M J Rosenberg; M J Coye; N J Binkin
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.024

9.  Visual display units and pregnancy: evidence from the Montreal survey.

Authors:  A D McDonald; N M Cherry; C Delorme; J C McDonald
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1986-12

10.  Embryological changes induced by weak, extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  J M Delgado; J Leal; J L Monteagudo; M G Gracia
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.610

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Possible health effects of working with VDUs.

Authors:  U Bergqvist
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1989-04

Review 2.  Work and pregnancy.

Authors:  A D McDonald
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1988-09

3.  Spontaneous abortion and work with visual display units.

Authors:  E Roman; V Beral; M Pelerin; C Hermon
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1992-07

Review 4.  Pregnant workers. A physician's guide to assessing safe employment.

Authors:  J S Feinberg; C R Kelley
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-02

5.  Risk of stillbirth from occupational and residential exposures.

Authors:  L M Pastore; I Hertz-Picciotto; J J Beaumont
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Use of questionnaires in a study of spontaneous abortion in a general population.

Authors:  G Axelsson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Video display terminal use during pregnancy and reproductive outcome--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Parazzini; L Luchini; C La Vecchia; P G Crosignani
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Congenital defects and work in pregnancy.

Authors:  A D McDonald; J C McDonald; B Armstrong; N M Cherry; R Côté; J Lavoie; A D Nolin; D Robert
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1988-09

9.  Effect of electromagnetic field exposure on the reproductive system.

Authors:  Myung Chan Gye; Chan Jin Park
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2012-03-31

Review 10.  Effects of the workplace on fertility and related reproductive outcomes.

Authors:  B Baranski
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.