Literature DB >> 4067627

Excitatory/inhibitory response types in the cochlear nucleus: relationships to discharge patterns and responses to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

W P Shofner, E D Young.   

Abstract

We have studied the response properties of single units in the cochlear nucleus of unanesthetized decerebrate cats. The purpose of the study was to compare the properties of cochlear nucleus units as described in two commonly used classification schemes. Units were first classified according to their receptive-field properties based on the relative prominence of excitatory and inhibitory responses to tones and noise. Units were then classified on the basis of their discharge patterns to short tone bursts at their best frequencies (BFs). Our results show that systematic relationships exist between the receptive-field properties and discharge patterns of cochlear nucleus units. Type I units give only excitatory responses to tones and noise. They are characterized by primary-like and chopper discharge patterns. Some units in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus have prepotentials in their spike waveforms. Prepotential units most often show primary-like discharge patterns, but prepotential units characterized by nonprimary-like discharge patterns are also found. Most prepotential units lack detectable inhibitory sidebands (type I), but two of the nonprimary-like prepotential units encountered in this study had inhibitory sidebands (type III). Type III units also give excitatory responses to BF tones, but they have inhibitory sidebands. Most type III units give chopper discharge patterns, and these units can be recorded throughout the cochlear nucleus. Some type III units in the dorsal cochlear nucleus give complex discharge patterns that can be described as a composite of the pauser pattern and other patterns. The complexity of these responses seems to increase as the amount of inhibition at BF increases. Type I/III units give excitatory responses to tones and noise, but have little or no spontaneous activity so they cannot be tested directly for inhibitory responses. Type I/III units typically show chopper discharge patterns. One group of type I/III units have rate-level functions with sloping saturation, suggesting that these may receive a predominance of input from low spontaneous rate auditory nerve fibers. Type II units are nonspontaneous and give excitatory responses to tones, but give weak or no responses to noise. While type II units are homogeneous as a group in terms of their response maps. BF rate-level functions, and responses to noise, they show a variety of discharge patterns in response to short tone bursts at BF.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4067627     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1985.54.4.917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  36 in total

1.  Correlation of AMPA receptor subunit composition with synaptic input in the mammalian cochlear nuclei.

Authors:  S M Gardner; L O Trussell; D Oertel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Cholinergic modulation of stellate cells in the mammalian ventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  K Fujino; D Oertel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Dorsal cochlear nucleus response properties following acoustic trauma: response maps and spontaneous activity.

Authors:  Wei-Li Diana Ma; Eric D Young
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Morphology of physiologically characterised ventral cochlear nucleus stellate cells.

Authors:  A R Palmer; M N Wallace; R H Arnott; T M Shackleton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Discharge properties of identified cochlear nucleus neurons and auditory nerve fibers in response to repetitive electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Alexander L Babalian; David K Ryugo; Eric M Rouiller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Onset neurones in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus project to the dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Robert H Arnott; Mark N Wallace; Trevor M Shackleton; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-06

7.  Single-neuron recordings from unanesthetized mouse dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Wei-Li Diana Ma; Stephan D Brenowitz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Subset of thin spike cortical neurons preserve the peripheral encoding of stimulus onsets.

Authors:  Frank G Lin; Robert C Liu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Hazard functions and expected spike density functions for neuron spike activity in the cochlear nucleus of the cat.

Authors:  N Bibikov; T Imig; F Samson
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-01

10.  Contralateral effects and binaural interactions in dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Kevin A Davis
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.