Literature DB >> 4060612

Motion perception during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms.

C J Erkelens, H Collewijn.   

Abstract

The relation between binocular and monocular motion perception was investigated. A random-dot stereogram (30 X 30 deg arc), containing a central figure seen in front of the background in stereoscopic vision, was viewed dichoptically by human subjects without a fixed visual frame of reference. The images seen by the right and left eye were moved laterally according to a triangular wave form, in counterphase, but with variable amplitude ratios. Under this condition only purely lateral movement and no motion in depth of the stereogram as a whole was perceived, while stereoscopic vision of the figure-background relation was maintained. The magnitude of the binocularly perceived lateral motion, signalled by manual tracking of the perceived displacement, equalled the algebraic mean of the monocular motion percepts. As a special case, when the two images forming the stereogram were moved with equal velocities but in opposite directions they were perceived as a completely stationary, fused image in stereoscopic depth. Only the addition of a stationary reference (a bar or grating seen by both eyes) resulted in the perception of motion in depth. We conclude that a visual frame of reference is essential for perception of motion in depth but not for perception of lateral movements. Moreover, it seems likely that not absolute binocular disparity (retinal locus differences) but relative binocular disparity (differences in angular distance between two or more corresponding features in the two retinal images) is a cue for perception of depth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4060612     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90164-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  31 in total

1.  Binocular neurons in V1 of awake monkeys are selective for absolute, not relative, disparity.

Authors:  B G Cumming; A J Parker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Visual responses in monkey areas V1 and V2 to three-dimensional surface configurations.

Authors:  J S Bakin; K Nakayama; C D Gilbert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Version and vergence eye movements in humans: open-loop dynamics determined by monocular rather than binocular image speed.

Authors:  G S Masson; D-S Yang; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Neural computations underlying depth perception.

Authors:  Akiyuki Anzai; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Short-latency ocular following in humans is dependent on absolute (rather than relative) binocular disparity.

Authors:  D-S Yang; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Perception can influence the vergence responses associated with open-loop gaze shifts in 3D.

Authors:  Boris M Sheliga; Frederick A Miles
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Human vergence eye movements initiated by competing disparities: evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Short-latency disparity vergence eye movements: a response to disparity energy.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Coding of stereoscopic depth information in visual areas V3 and V3A.

Authors:  Akiyuki Anzai; Syed A Chowdhury; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Efficiency of extracting stereo-driven object motions.

Authors:  Anshul Jain; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.