Literature DB >> 4056877

Behavior of an extradural pressure monitor in clinical use. Comparison of extradural with intraventricular pressure in patients with acute and chronically raised intracranial pressure.

M P Powell, H A Crockard.   

Abstract

A comparison of intraventricular pressure (IVP) and extradural pressure (EDP) was carried out in 17 patients being investigated for normal-pressure hydrocephalus, and in six patients with acutely raised intracranial pressure following events such as head injury or intracerebral hematoma. Extradural pressure was measured using the CardioSearch monitor. There was a reasonably good correlation between EDP and IVP in the chronic stable group with pressures up to 25 mm Hg. In the acute group there was no predictable relationship between EDP and IVP, and during a 24-hour period the pressures could vary by as much as 30 mm Hg. Subdural pressure, measured with the same instruments, was compared to IVP in both acute and stable situations in eight other patients: there was a close and constant correlation between pressures in these two spaces. The authors conclude that misleading information may be obtained from EDP monitoring, and erroneous management decisions may result from dependence on such a technique. Possible explanations for this are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4056877     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1985.63.5.0745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  7 in total

1.  Comparative analysis between epidural (Gaeltec) and subdural (Camino) intracranial pressure probes.

Authors:  C Weinstabl; B Richling; B Plainer; T Czech; C K Spiss
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1992-04

2.  Fundamentals of transorbital sonographic evaluation of optic nerve sheath expansion under intracranial hypertension. I. Experimental study.

Authors:  K Helmke; H C Hansen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1996-10

3.  A comparison of extradural and intraparenchymatous intracranial pressures in head injured patients.

Authors:  N Bruder; P N'Zoghe; N Graziani; D Pelissier; F Grisoli; G François
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Clinical evaluation of a new epidural pressure monitor.

Authors:  T Czech; A Korn; A Reinprecht; W Schramm; T Kimla; C K Spiss
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Relative risks of ventriculostomy infection and morbidity.

Authors:  C G Paramore; D A Turner
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 6.  Advances in Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Its Significance in Managing Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Usmah Kawoos; Richard M McCarron; Charles R Auker; Mikulas Chavko
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Tissue modeling and analyzing with finite element method: a review for cranium brain imaging.

Authors:  Xianfang Yue; Li Wang; Ruonan Wang
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2013-02-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.