Literature DB >> 4055815

The pressure dependent dynamic elasticity of 35 thoracic and 16 abdominal human aortas in vitro described by a five component model.

G J Langewouters, K H Wesseling, W J Goedhard.   

Abstract

Segments of 35 thoracic and 16 abdominal human aortas, including nine pairs, aged 30-78 yr at autopsy, were perfused with 37 degrees C Tyrode's solution at in situ length. Diameter changes due to 20 mmHg pressure steps between 20 and 180 mmHg were measured to 1 micron accuracy at an equivalent noise level of 0.1 micron RMS, using balanced transducers. Aortic creep curves at each pressure level were described individually by a constant plus bi-exponential creep model characterized by two creep fractions (alpha 1 and alpha 2) and two time constants (tau 1 and tau 2). Creep fractions and time constants increased substantially with the pressure level, indicating a significant effect of pressure or distension on aortic viscoelasticity. At 110 mmHg the mean +/- 1 S.D. parameter values were: thoracic aorta: alpha 1 = 0.076 +/- 0.017, alpha 2 = 0.102 +/- 0.028, tau 1 = 0.73 +/- 0.29 s, tau 2 = 14.0 +/- 4.1 s; abdominal aorta: alpha 1 = 0.078 +/- 0.017, alpha 2 = 0.101 +/- 0.025, tau 1 = 0.61 +/- 0.12 s, tau 2 = 12.1 +/- 3.4 s. Nine paired comparisons at each pressure level showed that creep fractions and time constants of thoracic and abdominal segments were not significantly different (p = 0.05).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4055815     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(85)90015-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  29 in total

1.  Mechanical properties of the fetal ductus venosus and umbilical vein.

Authors:  L R Hellevik; T Kiserud; F Irgens; N Stergiopulos; M Hanson
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Effect of exercise training on biologic vascular age in healthy seniors.

Authors:  Shigeki Shibata; Benjamin D Levine
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 3.  Is there a role for invasive hemodynamic monitoring in acute heart failure management?

Authors:  Daniel De Backer
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-06

4.  Applications of minimally invasive cardiac output monitors.

Authors:  Jahan Porhomayon; Gino Zadeii; Samuel Congello; Nader D Nader
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-04-24

5.  Evaluation of an improved algorithm for arterial pressure-based cardiac output assessment without external calibration.

Authors:  Christopher Prasser; Benedikt Trabold; Alexander Schwab; Cornelius Keyl; Susanne Ziegler; Christoph Wiesenack
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Cardiac index value measurement by invasive, semi-invasive and non invasive techniques: a prospective study in postoperative off pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients.

Authors:  Murali Chakravarthy; Subramanyam Rajeev; Vivek Jawali
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-05-02       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 7.  The arterial Windkessel.

Authors:  Nico Westerhof; Jan-Willem Lankhaar; Berend E Westerhof
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Identification of the human electrical impedance indifferent point: a surrogate for the volume indifferent point?

Authors:  Sara S Jarvis; James A Pawelczyk
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Advanced hemodynamic monitoring: principles and practice in neurocritical care.

Authors:  Christos Lazaridis
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.210

10.  Biological aortic age derived from the arterial pressure waveform.

Authors:  Shigeki Shibata; Benjamin D Levine
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-02-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.