Literature DB >> 4051601

Maintaining quality of care while reducing charges in the ICU. Ten ways.

J M Civetta, J A Hudson-Civetta.   

Abstract

We believed that the dilemma of controlling costs yet maintaining quality of care might be approached in 10 ways designed to improve efficiency of care: principles of management, elimination of standing orders, classification of patients, written guidelines, mandatory communication, no repetitive orders, single order for single test, removal of monitoring catheters, constant administrative attention, and feedback. We monitored quality of care using the therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS), mortality, utilization of bed days in the ICU, and the total hospitalization of 50 patients treated in April 1983 and, 8 months after the interventions, 50 patients treated in February 1984. There were no differences in the patient population, severity, outcome, or days. The total lab bills were $10,000 in 1983 and $6300 in 1984 (p less than 0.01). The total number of tests decreased by 2803 (42%) from 6685 to 3882, or 56 per patient per admission. Calculated ICU laboratory charges per patient decreased $3226 (53%) from $6210 to $2894. In 1983, while patients spent 15% of their hospital days in the ICU, they accumulated 61% of their total laboratory charges. In 1984, ICU days were 19% and ICU laboratory charges were 46% of the total. If the decrease of $3226 per patient is extrapolated to a year's population, this would decrease charges by over $2,000,000 in one 12-bed surgical ICU.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4051601      PMCID: PMC1250958          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198510000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  12 in total

1.  A more effective, efficient and equitable system.

Authors:  V R Fuchs
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1976-07

2.  Therapeutic intervention scoring system: a method for quantitative comparison of patient care.

Authors:  D J Cullen; J M Civetta; B A Briggs; L C Ferrara
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1974 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  The inverse relationship between cost and survival.

Authors:  J M Civetta
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Rationing intensive care--physician responses to a resource shortage.

Authors:  D E Singer; P L Carr; A G Mulley; G E Thibault
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-11-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Medical intensive care for the elderly. A study of current use, costs, and outcomes.

Authors:  E W Campion; A G Mulley; R L Goldstein; G O Barnett; G E Thibault
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-11-06       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  High-cost users of medical care.

Authors:  C J Zook; F D Moore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-05-01       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Institutional responses to prospective payment based on diagnosis-related groups. Implications for cost, quality, and access.

Authors:  R S Stern; A M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-03-07       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Benefit and cost analysis in geriatric care. Turning age discrimination into health policy.

Authors:  J Avorn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-05-17       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Toward strategies for cost containment in surgical patients.

Authors:  W R Drucker; J W Gavett; R Kirshner; W J Messick; G Ingersoll
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Technology under Medicare diagnosis-related groups prospective payment. Implications for medical intensive care.

Authors:  P W Butler; R C Bone; T Field
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  6 in total

1.  Physician impact on the total cost of care.

Authors:  P A Taheri; D Butz; L C Griffes; D R Morlock; L J Greenfield
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Reducing the costs of ICU admission in Canada without diagnosis-related or case-mix groupings.

Authors:  M J Girotti; S J Brown
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1986-11

Review 3.  Cost-effective use of the surgical intensive care unit.

Authors:  S D Eyer; F B Cerra
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Trauma service cost: the real story.

Authors:  P A Taheri; W L Wahl; D A Butz; L H Iteld; A J Michaels; L C Griffes; L J Greenfield
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Trauma care in Germany: an inclusive system.

Authors:  Johannes A Sturm; Hans-Christoph Pape; Thomas Dienstknecht
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  ICU and non-ICU cost per day.

Authors:  C Norris; P Jacobs; J Rapoport; S Hamilton
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.063

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.