Literature DB >> 4050792

Differences in the error mechanisms affecting sex and autosomal chromosomes in women of different ages within the reproductive age group.

J H Ford, J A Russell.   

Abstract

Aneuploidy was assessed in lymphocyte cultures from 16 women aged between 20 and 50. Between 236 and 1,677 cells were studied per subject and the gains and losses of each chromosome recorded. The X chromosome was found to show the same ratio of loss to gain (approximately 3:1) at all ages, but the frequency of total aneuploidy (loss plus gain) showed a significant increase with age. By contrast, there was no clear association of the frequency of autosomal chromosome aneuploidy with age, but the ratio of loss to gain was significantly greater in younger women (aged 21-35) than in older women (aged 36-50). Thus, X chromosomes in females are affected by a mechanism of error different to that affecting autosomal chromosomes. Although the ratio of loss to gain changes, the relative involvement of the different autosomal chromosomes is unchanged with age. Thus, the initial "recruitment" of chromosomes undergoing error is the same in both groups, but the "processing" of these chromosomes is different. Since the relative involvement of autosomes in aneuploidy mimics their relative involvement in displacement, it is proposed that displacement is the initial or "recruitment" step in error. "Processing" then commonly involves "chromosome elimination" in younger women and more frequent "random segregation" in older women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4050792      PMCID: PMC1684681     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  15 in total

1.  Chromosomal nondisjunction: the action of colcemid on Chinese hamster cells in vitro.

Authors:  D M Cox; T T Puck
Journal:  Cytogenetics       Date:  1969

2.  Non-random chromosome loss in PHA-stimulated lymphocytes from normal individuals.

Authors:  T Brown; D P Fox; F W Robertson; I Bullock
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Spindle microtubular dysfunction in mothers of Down syndrome children.

Authors:  J H Ford
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Displacement of chromosomes in mitosis: a technique for assessing differential chromosome error.

Authors:  J H Ford; C Roberts
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1983

5.  Chromosome displacement and spindle tubule polymerization: 1. The effect of alterations in pH on displacement frequency.

Authors:  J H Ford; C G Roberts
Journal:  Cytobios       Date:  1983

6.  Aneuploidy and ageing: chromosome studies on a random sample of the population using G-banding.

Authors:  S M Galloway; K E Buckton
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1978

7.  Factors affecting the displacement of human chromosomes from the metaphase plate.

Authors:  J H Ford; P Lester
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1982

8.  Aneuploidy and age in a population survey.

Authors:  A A Sandberg; M M Cohen; A A Rimm; M L Levin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  A mechanism of x chromosome aneuploidy in lymphocytes of aging women.

Authors:  P H Fitzgerald
Journal:  Humangenetik       Date:  1975-06-19

10.  Is there a predisposition for meiotic nondisjunction that may be detected by mitotic hyperploidy?

Authors:  C Staessen; A M Maes; M Kirsch-Volders; C Susanne
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 4.438

View more
  11 in total

1.  Replication asynchrony increases in women at risk for aneuploid offspring.

Authors:  A Amiel; O Reish; E Gaber; I Kedar; R Diukman; M Fejgin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  The frequency of aneuploidy in cultured lymphocytes is correlated with age and gender but not with reproductive history.

Authors:  G P Nowinski; D L Van Dyke; B C Tilley; G Jacobsen; V R Babu; M J Worsham; G N Wilson; L Weiss
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Increased spindle resistance to antimicrotubule agents in cells prone to chromosomal nondisjunction.

Authors:  L Avivi; A Dotan; Y Ravia; A Amiel; H Shacham; Y Neumann
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Constitutional and acquired autosomal aneuploidy.

Authors:  Colleen Jackson-Cook
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.935

5.  Cytogenetics of premature ovarian failure: an investigation on 269 affected women.

Authors:  Simona Baronchelli; Donatella Conconi; Elena Panzeri; Angela Bentivegna; Serena Redaelli; Sara Lissoni; Fabiana Saccheri; Nicoletta Villa; Francesca Crosti; Elena Sala; Emanuela Martinoli; Marinella Volontè; Anna Marozzi; Leda Dalprà
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-01-17

6.  Effects of calorie restriction on chromosomal stability in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Charleen M Moore; Betty G Dunn; C Alex McMahan; Mark A Lane; George S Roth; Donald K Ingram; Julie A Mattison
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2006-11-21

7.  Sex chromosome loss and non-disjunction in women: analysis of chromosomal segregation in binucleated lymphocytes.

Authors:  A Zijno; P Leopardi; F Marcon; R Crebelli
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Sex chromosome loss and aging: in situ hybridization studies on human interphase nuclei.

Authors:  M Guttenbach; B Koschorz; U Bernthaler; T Grimm; M Schmid
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Increased spindle resistance to antimicrotubule agents in women of high risk for meiotic nondisjunction.

Authors:  A Dotan; L Avivi
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Cryptic subtelomeric rearrangements and X chromosome mosaicism: a study of 565 apparently normal individuals with fluorescent in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Jasen L Wise; Richard J Crout; Daniel W McNeil; Robert J Weyant; Mary L Marazita; Sharon L Wenger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.