Literature DB >> 4045362

Automatic measurement of blood pressure: evaluation of the Copal UA-231 automatic sphygmomanometer.

J E Gallacher, J W Yarnell, S Rogers, P Sweetnam.   

Abstract

The suitability of an automatic sphygmomanometer for epidemiological work was evaluated in two studies. In the first, blood pressure measurements were made alternately on the automatic machine and on a Hawksley random zero instrument on 14 volunteers on each of four consecutive days by a single medical observer. No significant difference was found between the mean diastolic pressure obtained by each instrument but the mean systolic pressure was 5 mm higher on average on the automatic machine. In the second study, the effect of cuff position for the automatic instrument was examined. Differences between recommended and errant cuff positions of up to 4.5 mmHg were recorded but these did not reach statistical significance. These studies indicate that if used carefully this automatic instrument is suitable for survey and experimental use.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4045362      PMCID: PMC1052438          DOI: 10.1136/jech.39.3.220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  7 in total

1.  A SPHYGMOMANOMETER FOR EPIDEMIOLOGISTS.

Authors:  G A ROSE; W W HOLLAND; E A CROWLEY
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1964-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  EFFECT OF VERTICAL DISPLACEMENT OF THE ARM ON INDIRECT BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT.

Authors:  P L MITCHELL; R W PARLIN; H BLACKBURN
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1964-07-09       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Factors influencing arterial blood pressure in the general polulation.

Authors:  W E MIALL; P D OLDHAM
Journal:  Clin Sci       Date:  1958-08       Impact factor: 6.124

4.  A study of blood pressure among Negro school-children.

Authors:  G ROSE
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1962-04

5.  A random-zero sphygmomanometer.

Authors:  B M Wright; C F Dore
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1970-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Comparison of performance of various sphygmomanometers with intra-arterial blood-pressure readings.

Authors:  S N Hunyor; J M Flynn; C Cochineas
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-07-15

7.  Influence of arm position on measurement of blood pressure.

Authors:  J Webster; D Newnham; J C Petrie; H G Lovell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-05-26
  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Ambulatory pressure monitoring in the assessment of antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  A J Coats; J Conway; V K Somers; J E Isea; P Sleight
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.727

2.  Assessment of the Copal UA-251 automatic blood pressure recorder under field survey conditions.

Authors:  I K Crombie; E C Clark; W C Smith
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Field evaluation of the Copal UA-231 automatic sphygmomanometer.

Authors:  S Rogers; G D Smith; W Doyle
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Comparison of methods of measuring blood pressure.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  A comparison of the chronic effects of oral xamoterol and enalapril on blood pressure and renal function in mild to moderate heart failure.

Authors:  M J Jamieson; J Webster; G Fowler; J Rawles; F W Smith; J C Petrie
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Community-based blood pressure measurement by non-health workers using electronic devices: a validation study.

Authors:  Daniel D Reidpath; Mei Lee Ling; Shajahan Yasin; Kanason Rajagobal; Pascale Allotey
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.640

7.  Two Welsh surveys of blood lead and blood pressure.

Authors:  P C Elwood; G Davey-Smith; P D Oldham; C Toothill
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.