Literature DB >> 4043048

A comparison of the effects of mixed static and dynamic work with mainly dynamic work in hot conditions.

I P Randle, S J Legg.   

Abstract

Current physiological criteria for limiting work in hot conditions are frequently based on responses to mainly dynamic work (eg treadmill walking). Their applicability to industrial situations containing mixed static and dynamic work is questioned, since the physiological responses to static work are different from those of dynamic work. Each of eight subjects attempted a one hour uphill treadmill walk (mainly dynamic work), and an uphill treadmill walk whilst intermittently carrying a 20 kg weight in the arms (mixed static and dynamic work). The external work rates in the two conditions were equal, effected by lowering the treadmill gradient in the loaded condition. Experiments were conducted in a hot climate (33 degrees C dry bulb, 25 degrees C wet bulb). Oxygen consumption, minute ventilation, sweat rate and rated perceived exertion were all significantly higher (p less than 0.001) for the mixed static and dynamic work than for the dynamic work. This was also the case for heart rate and forearm skin temperature (p less than 0.01), and for auditory canal temperature (p less than 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two types of work for mean skin temperature, calf skin temperature and chest skin temperature. These results show that for the same external work, physiological strain and perceived exertion are greater for mixed static and dynamic work (carrying a load in the arms) than for mainly dynamic work (walking on a treadmill). They suggest that it is not appropriate to make direct comparisons of laboratory studies based on dynamic work, with practical situations containing mixed static and dynamic work in the heat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4043048     DOI: 10.1007/bf02335930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  15 in total

1.  THE CIRCULATIORY EFFECTS OF SUSTAINED VOLUNTARY MUSCLE CONTRACTION.

Authors:  A R LIND; S H TAYLOR; P W HUMPHREYS; B M KENNELLY; K W DONALD
Journal:  Clin Sci       Date:  1964-10       Impact factor: 6.124

2.  TOLERANCE OF MAN WORKING IN HOT, HUMID ENVIRONMENTS.

Authors:  P F IAMPIETRO; R F GOLDMEN
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  A physiological criterion for setting thermal environmental limits for everyday work.

Authors:  A R LIND
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 3.531

4.  A technique for assessing postural discomfort.

Authors:  E N Corlett; R P Bishop
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  A new definition of mechanical work done in human movement.

Authors:  D A Winter
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1979-01

6.  Durations of safe exposure for men at work in high temperature environments.

Authors:  C R Bell; M J Crowder; J D Walters
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  A physiological study of the repetitive lifting capabilities of healthy young males.

Authors:  S J Legg; C M Pateman
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Comparison between load carriage and grade walking on a treadmill.

Authors:  M J Gordon; B R Goslin; T Graham; J Hoare
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Mechanical energy analyses of the human during local carriage on a treadmill.

Authors:  M R Pierrynowsi; R W Norman; D A Winter
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  The 'Oxylog': an evaluation.

Authors:  M H Harrison; G A Brown; A J Belyavin
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  2 in total

1.  Physiological strains while pushing or hauling.

Authors:  M Garcin; J Y Cravic; H Vandewalle; H Monod
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

2.  Maximal aerobic capacity for repetitive lifting: comparison with three standard exercise testing modes.

Authors:  M A Sharp; E Harman; J A Vogel; J J Knapik; S J Legg
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1988
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.