Literature DB >> 8925819

Physiological strains while pushing or hauling.

M Garcin1, J Y Cravic, H Vandewalle, H Monod.   

Abstract

An experiment has been designed to compare two ways of load moving: pushing with a bar or hauling with a pelvic belt, against the same resistances, at the same speeds. This study has been carried out in the laboratory on a treadmill, using two groups: 15 healthy sedentary men and 10 endurance trained male athletes. The task consisted of pushing or hauling against the same resistance (3, 5 and 7 kg for the first group and 6, 8, 9 and 10 kg for the second) at two walking speeds (3 and 4 km. h-1 for the first group and 3.7 and 4.7 km.h-1 for the second). The physiological strains were studied by measuring heart rate (HR) and oxygen consumption (VO2) in both experiments. In addition, perceived exertion was estimated in the second group according to a rating scale of perceived exertion (RPE). Analysis of variance showed that pushing with the arms was more strenuous than hauling with a pelvic belt with regard to HR, VO2 and RPE (P < 0.01). When resistances and speeds were grouped, the differences between pushing and hauling were equal to 3 beats min-1, 0.85 ml. min-1. kg-1 for HR and VO2, respectively, for the first experiment (sedentary subjects), whereas the differences were equal to 11.4 beats. min-1, 1.66 ml.min-1.kg-1 and 2.15 for HR, VO2 and RPE, respectively, for the second experiment (trained endurance athletes). In the endurance athletes, there was a parallel upward shift of the VO2-HR linear relationship for pushing (covariance analysis, P < 0.01), which suggested that an element of static work (pushing with the upper limbs) added to the dynamic work could explain the higher physiological cost during pushing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8925819     DOI: 10.1007/bf00242278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  13 in total

1.  On the manual handling of wide-body carts used by cabin attendants in civil aircraft.

Authors:  J Winkel
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  Physiologic responses to static, dynamic and combined work.

Authors:  S S Asfour; A M Genaidy; T M Khalil; S Muthuswamy
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1986-12

3.  Cardiovascular responses to holding and carrying weights by hand and by shoulder harness.

Authors:  A R Lind; G W McNicol
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 3.531

4.  Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress.

Authors:  G Borg
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1970

5.  Effects of dynamic, static and combined work on heart rate and oxygen consumption.

Authors:  J Sanchez; H Monod; F Chabaud
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Heart rate responses to a repetitive load carrying task.

Authors:  Y Zerbib; O M Evans; H Monod
Journal:  J Hum Ergol (Tokyo)       Date:  1983-12

7.  Metabolic and cardiovascular cost, and perceived effort over an 8 hour day when lifting loads selected by the psychophysical method.

Authors:  S J Legg; W S Myles
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Comparison of different methods of load carriage.

Authors:  S J Legg
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Physiological responses to load holding and load carriage.

Authors:  O M Evańs; Y Zerbib; M H Faria; H Monod
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  The design of manual handling tasks.

Authors:  S H Snook
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  4 in total

1.  Psychophysical basis for maximum pushing and pulling forces: A review and recommendations.

Authors:  Arun Garg; Thomas Waters; Jay Kapellusch; Waldemar Karwowski
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.656

2.  Effect of a 20-day ski trek on fuel selection during prolonged exercise at low workload with ingestion of 13C-glucose.

Authors:  F Péronnet; M Abdelaoui; C Lavoie; C Marrao; S Kerr; D Massicotte; G Giesbrecht
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The Effects of Direction of Exertion, Path, and Load Placement in Nursing Cart Pushing and Pulling Tasks: An Electromyographical Study.

Authors:  Huei Chu Kao; Chiuhsiang Joe Lin; Yung Hui Lee; Su Huang Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Stroller running: Energetic and kinematic changes across pushing methods.

Authors:  Ryan S Alcantara; Cara M Wall-Scheffler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.