Literature DB >> 4039984

Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of the epipodophyllotoxin derivative etoposide (VP 16-213) in patients with gestational choriocarcinoma and malignant teratoma.

C J Brindley, P Antoniw, E S Newlands, K D Bagshawe.   

Abstract

Serum levels of etoposide obtained 5 min after administration of 100 mg/m2 were between 11 and 30 micrograms/ml. By 24 h after drug administration, serum levels had fallen to between 0.19 and 1.11 micrograms/ml. Interpatient variation of etoposide serum concentrations obtained 5 min after drug administration was low, whereas interpatient variation 24 h later was noticeably higher. A significant correlation was observed (r = -0.698) between the WBC nadir and the mean etoposide serum concentrations, measured 24 h after drug administration, in patients receiving etoposide in combination with cyclophosphamide and actinomycin D. However, a relationship was not observed in those patients receiving etoposide alone. There was no observed difference in the efficacy or toxicity of 500 mg/m2 etoposide when the dose was administered either as 100 mg/m2 on each of 5 consecutive days or as 250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 3. There was no significant difference between AUC values calculated from etoposide concentration versus time profiles in patients receiving the drug on days 1 and 3 and those values obtained with the 5-day schedule. Patients resistant to a conventional dose of etoposide were given a higher dose of 1 g/m2/24 h, but this schedule did not cause an increase in efficacy despite an increase in serum levels of the drug. CSF levels in two of these patients receiving high-dose etoposide were 1.28% and 2.09% of the serum concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4039984     DOI: 10.1007/bf00257298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of the human pharmacokinetics of VM-26 and VP-16, two antineoplastic epipodophyllotixin glucopyranoside derivatives.

Authors:  L M Allen; P J Creaven
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Forecasting individual pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S Beal; B Rosenberg; V V Marathe
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  STRIPE: an interactive computer program for the analysis of drug pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  A Johnston; R C Woollard
Journal:  J Pharmacol Methods       Date:  1983-05

Review 4.  The practical benefits of pharmacokinetics in the use of antineoplastic agents.

Authors:  C Erlichman; R C Donehower; B A Chabner
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  VP16-213 as a single agent in advanced testicular tumors.

Authors:  B M Fitzharris; S B Kaye; S Saverymuttu; E S Newlands; A Barrett; M J Peckham; T J McElwain
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Analysis of the anticancer drugs VP 16-213 and VM 26 and their metabolites by high-performance liquid chromatography.

Authors:  R J Strife; I Jardine; M Colvin
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1980-05-09

7.  Pharmacokinetic principles of antineoplastic drug therapy.

Authors:  L M Allen
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1983 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 3.126

8.  Anti-tumour activity of the epipodophyllin derivative VP16-213 (etoposide: NSC-141540) in gestational choriocarcinoma.

Authors:  E S Newlands; K D Bagshawe
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 9.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of commonly used anticancer drugs.

Authors:  F M Balis; J S Holcenberg; W A Bleyer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Further advances in the management of malignant teratomas of the testis and other sites.

Authors:  E S Newlands; R H Begent; G J Rustin; D Parker; K D Bagshawe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-04-30       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  11 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetics of the BEACOPP polychemotherapy regimen in Hodgkin's lymphoma and its effect on myelotoxicity.

Authors:  Stefan Wilde; Alexander Jetter; Stephan Rietbrock; Dirk Kasel; Andreas Engert; Andreas Josting; Beate Klimm; Georg Hempel; Stefanie Reif; Ulrich Jaehde; Ute Merkel; Dagmar Busse; Matthias Schwab; Volker Diehl; Uwe Fuhr
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Etoposide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in combination chemotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  J M Henwood; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Antineoplastic drugs in 1990. A review (Part II).

Authors:  D J Black; R B Livingston
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  The pharmacokinetics of high dose cyclophosphamide and high dose etoposide.

Authors:  D Cunningham; J Cummings; R B Blackie; L McTaggart; S W Banham; S B Kaye; M Soukop
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1988

5.  Etoposide protein binding in cancer patients.

Authors:  B Liu; H M Earl; C J Poole; J Dunn; D J Kerr
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 6.  Etoposide and teniposide. Bioanalysis, metabolism and clinical pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  J J Holthuis
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1988-06-17

7.  Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of two modalities of etoposide infusion in metastatic non-small-cell lung carcinoma.

Authors:  E Chatelut; C Chevreau; E Blancy; A Lequellec; P Canal; H Roche; G Houin; R Bugat
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs in children.

Authors:  W R Crom; A M Glynn-Barnhart; J H Rodman; M E Teresi; R E Kavanagh; M L Christensen; M V Relling; W E Evans
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Activity and distribution studies of etoposide and mitozolomide in vivo and in vitro against human choriocarcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  C J Brindley; R B Pedley; P Antoniw; E S Newlands
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 10.  The clinical pharmacology of etoposide and teniposide.

Authors:  P I Clark; M L Slevin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.