Literature DB >> 4036128

How do doctors discuss do-not-resuscitate orders?

A Miller, B Lo.   

Abstract

Although patient preferences are important in decisions about "do not resuscitate" (DNR) orders, little is known about how physicians discuss these orders with patients. We asked 15 physicians to simulate discussing such orders with a patient. We found a striking variation in whether physicians explicitly asked for patient preferences, how they described cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and its possible outcomes and whether they made a recommendation to the patient about DNR orders. There was no pattern to the different amounts of information presented about CPR. Physicians gave conflicting reasons for how they individualized discussions with patients. Awareness of such different behaviors may stimulate physicians to examine what they say to patients about this sensitive and important topic and why they say it.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; University of California, San Francisco

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4036128      PMCID: PMC1306302     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  7 in total

1.  Beyond medical paternalism and patient autonomy: a model of physician conscience for the physician-patient relationship.

Authors:  D C Thomasma
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Deciding whether to resuscitate.

Authors:  B Lo; R L Steinbrook
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1983-08

3.  Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital.

Authors:  S E Bedell; T L Delbanco; E F Cook; F H Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-09-08       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The do-not-resuscitate order in a teaching hospital: considerations and a suggested policy.

Authors:  S H Miles; R Cranford; A L Schultz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Ethical dilemmas and the clinician.

Authors:  B Lo; A R Jonsen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Arrogance.

Authors:  F J Ingelfinger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-12-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Fallacy of the five-year survival in lung cancer.

Authors:  B J McNeil; R Weichselbaum; S G Pauker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-12-21       Impact factor: 91.245

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  A history of history-taking: the medical interview.

Authors:  J D Stoeckle; J A Billings
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  End-of-life discussions: a need unfulfilled and a task undefined.

Authors:  M O Hodges
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  How do medical residents discuss resuscitation with patients?

Authors:  J A Tulsky; M A Chesney; B Lo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Determining resuscitation preferences of elderly inpatients: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher Frank; Daren K Heyland; Benjamin Chen; Donald Farquhar; Kathryn Myers; Ken Iwaasa
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Resuscitation decision making in the elderly: the value of outcome data.

Authors:  R S Schonwetter; R M Walker; D R Kramer; B E Robinson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Patient knowledge and physician predictions of treatment preferences after discussion of advance directives.

Authors:  G S Fischer; J A Tulsky; M R Rose; L A Siminoff; R M Arnold
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.128

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.