Literature DB >> 4027485

Lateralization effects in reading pointed and unpointed Hebrew.

A Koriat.   

Abstract

Hebrew has two forms of spelling, pointed and unpointed. In the pointed spelling, diacritical signs (pointing) are added to consonantal letters to convey vowel information. These are omitted in the unpointed spelling. Since pointing conveys information that is critical for the prelexical derivation of phonology, it was hypothesized that its absence would prove detrimental for left hemisphere (LH) but not for right hemisphere (RH) reading and that, for the former, pointing effects would increase with increasing word length. Three experiments, one involving lexical decision and two involving word pronunciation, yielded little support for these hypotheses; rather, pointing had an overall adverse effect on performance, and this effect tended to be more pronounced for LH reading. In general, however, the results indicated an LH advantage. Since for central vision pointing has been found to aid performance under similar conditions, the results were seen to suggest a distinction between the visual and the phonological effects of pointing: pointing may impair early stages of visual analysis but may aid in the derivation of speech codes.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4027485     DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1985.tb01939.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  6 in total

Review 1.  How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: the SERIOL model and selective literature review.

Authors:  C Whitney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

2.  The importance of vowel diacritics for the temporary retention of high and low frequency Hebrew words of varying syllabic length.

Authors:  Vered Vaknin-Nusbaum; Paul Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

3.  Lexical access for low- and high-frequency words in Hebrew.

Authors:  A Koriat
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-01

4.  Does the reading of different orthographies produce distinct brain activity patterns? An ERP study.

Authors:  Irit Bar-Kochva; Zvia Breznitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluating effects of divided hemispheric processing on word recognition in foveal and extrafoveal displays: the evidence from Arabic.

Authors:  Abubaker A A Almabruk; Kevin B Paterson; Victoria McGowan; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Reading direction and the central perceptual span in Urdu and English.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Victoria A McGowan; Sarah J White; Sameen Malik; Lily Abedipour; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.