Literature DB >> 4022478

Macrosomia--maternal characteristics and infant complications.

W N Spellacy, S Miller, A Winegar, P Q Peterson.   

Abstract

Using a 1982 to 1983 regional network data bank of 33,545 delivered infants, a study was conducted comparing 574 macrosomic infants weighing greater than 4500 g to a control group of 18,739 infants whose birth weights were 2500 to 3499 g. Macrosomic infants occurred in 1.7% of the deliveries. Women delivering macrosomic infants were significantly older, of higher parity, more obese (greater than 90 kg), and more frequently diabetic and postmature (longer than 42 weeks) than the controls. The women having macrosomic infants had a higher frequency of cesarean deliveries. The macrosomic infants were more often male and had more birth trauma and shoulder dystocia, higher death rates, and lower Apgar scores. Five-minute Apgar scores were lowest in the very macrosomic subgroup (greater than 5000 g). The high-risk group triad included obesity, diabetes, and post-dates and had a macrosomia frequency of 5 to 14%. Macrosomic infants delivered by cesarean section had significantly fewer birth injuries. Because of these serious perinatal problems, women at risk should be screened for macrosomic infants, and if found, they should be delivered electively by cesarean section.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4022478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  59 in total

1.  Does screening for gestational diabetes mellitus make a difference?

Authors:  Mathew Sermer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Macrosomia has its roots in early placental development.

Authors:  N Schwartz; H S Quant; M D Sammel; S Parry
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 3.  Aging of the placenta.

Authors:  H Fox
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 4.  International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy.

Authors:  Boyd E Metzger; Steven G Gabbe; Bengt Persson; Thomas A Buchanan; Patrick A Catalano; Peter Damm; Alan R Dyer; Alberto de Leiva; Moshe Hod; John L Kitzmiler; Lynn P Lowe; H David McIntyre; Jeremy J N Oats; Yasue Omori; Maria Ines Schmidt
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 17.152

5.  Fetal weight estimation for prediction of fetal macrosomia: does additional clinical and demographic data using pattern recognition algorithm improve detection?

Authors:  Shimon Degani; Dori Peleg; Karina Bahous; Zvi Leibovitz; Israel Shapiro; Gonen Ohel
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2008-01

6.  Intrauterine growth rate in pregnancies complicated by type 1, type 2 and gestational diabetes.

Authors:  E L Lim; T Burden; S M Marshall; J M Davison; M J Blott; J S J Waugh; R Taylor
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2009-03-01

7.  Current strategy for detection and diagnosis of hyperglycemic disorders in pregnancy.

Authors:  Angelo Santamaria; Pietro Cignini; Angelica Trapanese; Silvia Bonalumi
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2011-01

8.  Managing diabetes during pregnancy. Guide for family physicians.

Authors:  Ian P Sempowski; R L Houlden
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 9.  Gestational diabetes mellitus. Unresolved issues and future research directions.

Authors:  N Okun; A Verma; N Demianczuk
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Large for Gestational Age Births Among South Indian Women: Temporal Trend and Risk Factors from 1996 to 2010.

Authors:  Lakshmanan Jeyaseelan; Bijesh Yadav; Veerasamy Silambarasan; Reeta Vijayaselvi; Ruby Jose
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.