Literature DB >> 4021780

A comparison between free-weight and isokinetic bench pressing.

J E Lander, B T Bates, J A Sawhill, J Hamill.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate selected parameters describing performance characteristics of a free-weight and isokinetic bench press. A secondary purpose was an attempt to clarify the technique requirements essential for a successful lift. Parameters describing the free-weight condition were generated from cinematographic data (150 fps) for five trials each at 90 and 75% of the subject's maximal performance (1RM). Isokinetic data were obtained from an instrumented Cybex Power Bench Press at two speeds corresponding to the average speeds for the free-weight conditions. Despite differences, accommodation appeared to occur for both methods when the lifts were performed maximally. A "sticking region" was defined as the portion of the free-weight activity when the subjects' force application was less than the weight of the bar. No significant difference (P less than 0.05) was observed between the 90% 1RM (26.02%) and 75% 1RM (26.94%) mean relative time values for these regions. For the Cybex device, the percentage of the activity which was isokinetic was longer for the slower speeds of rotation (0.47 rad X s-1 = 70%) and steadily decreased until the movement was only 50% isokinetic at 1.74 rad X s-1. The observed relationships between applied force-time data along with anatomical considerations suggest an ideal technique for the lift.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4021780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  18 in total

1.  A test of the maximum-power stimulus theory for strength.

Authors:  J A Mastropaolo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

Review 2.  A biomechanical evaluation of resistance: fundamental concepts for training and sports performance.

Authors:  David M Frost; John Cronin; Robert U Newton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The influence of velocity overshoot movement artifact on isokinetic knee extension tests.

Authors:  Fabiano Peruzzo Schwartz; Martim Bottaro; Rodrigo Souza Celes; Lee E Brown; Francisco Assis de Oliveira Nascimento
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  A comparison of the kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity between pneumatic and free weight resistance.

Authors:  David Michael Frost; John Barry Cronin; Robert Usher Newton
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Muscle activations under varying lifting speeds and intensities during bench press.

Authors:  Akihiro Sakamoto; Peter James Sinclair
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  The effectiveness of bench press training with or without throws on strength and shot put distance of competitive university athletes.

Authors:  Akihiro Sakamoto; Akihiro Kuroda; Peter James Sinclair; Hisashi Naito; Kazuhiko Sakuma
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  A brief review of strength and ballistic assessment methodologies in sport.

Authors:  Daniel Travis McMaster; Nicholas Gill; John Cronin; Michael McGuigan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Interrelationships among various measures of upper body strength assessed by different contraction modes. Evidence for a general strength component.

Authors:  T Hortobagyi; F I Katch; P F LaChance
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1989

9.  Strength-velocity relationship and fatiguability of unilateral versus bilateral arm extension.

Authors:  A A Vandervoort; D G Sale; J R Moroz
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1987

10.  Range of Motion and Sticking Region Effects on the Bench Press Load-Velocity Relationship.

Authors:  Alejandro Martínez-Cava; Ricardo Morán-Navarro; Alejandro Hernández-Belmonte; Javier Courel-Ibáñez; Elena Conesa-Ros; Juan José González-Badillo; Jesús G Pallarés
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.