Literature DB >> 4012345

Social and cultural factors in the etiology of low birthweight among disadvantaged blacks.

M S Boone.   

Abstract

This report gives results from eight intensive, exploratory interviews with Black women who suffered infant deaths within one year after delivery. Interviews were conducted as a final step in a research project to discover the correlates of very low birthweight among disadvantaged women in a city which maintains among the highest low birthweight and infant mortality rates in the United States. Qualitative results are presented within the context of a case/control study based on an in-depth medical record review. Statistical results showed that prenatal care, alcoholism, migrant status, smoking, hypertension history and previous poor pregnancy outcome distinguished women with very low birthweight infants. The medical record review also implicated violence, weak social support systems, poor social and psychological adjustments and ineffective contraception. Interview results further explore the social and psychological context of pregnancy for the disadvantaged inner city Black woman. Three-quarters of all women are unmarried at the time of delivery, and interviewed women expressed bitterness and resentment toward the men in their livers for non-support. They received the most help from 'girlfriends', and not consistent support--as expected--from mothers and female kin. Answers to open-ended questions and responses to a specially designed interview section on attitudes and beliefs suggest that these women conceptually dissociate three important areas of cultural focus: relationships with men, pregnancy and childbirth; and, that they value the 'gestator' role as separate from the role of 'mother'. They espouse contradictory beliefs about men: they believe that men are predatory and not trustworthy, but also more mainstream beliefs that call for reliance on the opposite sex. Because of their unstable relationships with men and their long histories of poor pregnancy outcome and termination, they face frequent disappointment. Responses to items in the attitudes and beliefs section suggest that these women feel powerless, hopeless and that life is somewhat meaningless. However, items designed to test Lewis' 'culture of poverty' do not support the concept of a consistent intergenerational poverty lifestyle. The report closes with a section on program and policy development in several areas: public health recordkeeping, health style education programs, special training programs for physicians and other health personnel, and some type of program to combat the social alienation and psychological distress of inner city women during pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4012345     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90256-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  5 in total

1.  Factors which influence use of prenatal care in low-income racial-ethnic women in Los Angeles County.

Authors:  R E Zambrana; C Dunkel-Schetter; S Scrimshaw
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1991-10

Review 2.  Evaluation of quality of life for diverse patient populations.

Authors:  K R Yabroff; B P Linas; K Schulman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Role of stress in low birthweight disparities between black and white women: a population-based study.

Authors:  Shondra Loggins Clay; Flavia Cristina Drumond Andrade
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 1.954

4.  Hospital use and health status of women during the 5 years following the birth of a premature, low-birthweight infant.

Authors:  J S Haas; M C McCormick
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Maternal support in the delivery room and birthweight among African-American women.

Authors:  Antoine Alexandra Lespinasse; Richard J David; James W Collins; Arden S Handler; Stephen N Wall
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.798

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.