Literature DB >> 4008208

Stereoacuity degradation by experimental and real monocular and binocular amblyopia.

R T Goodwin, P E Romano.   

Abstract

Fourteen normal adult volunteers with normal binocular single vision and normal stereoacuity submitted to monocular and binocular degradation of their stereoacuity by cycloplegia and fogging with spherical lenses. Stereoacuity (SA) was reduced as soon as visual acuity (VA), both monocular and binocular, was reduced. There was a marked similarity in the degree of SA reduction produced by monocular and binocular amblyopia. The degree of SA reduction was slightly more marked with monocular decrements than with binocular at VAs between 20/25 and 20/50. Significant intersubject variation was noted. The majority of subjects maintained gross SA at 20/200 monocular or binocular. One subject was reduced to gross stereopsis at 20/30 monocular and 20/50 binocular VAs. Two subjects were able to retain 40 sec of SA until vision was degraded to 20/50. Conversely, 40 sec of SA was not achieved by any subject at monocular or binocular vision less than 20/40 (test for malingering). Thirteen patients with real monocular and binocular organic or functional amblyopia were then compared with the experimental group. On the whole, patients scored somewhat better than normals but their scores fell within the range of responses found in the normal group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4008208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  23 in total

1.  A prospective study of the effect of a unilateral macular hole on sensory and motor binocular function and recovery following successful surgery.

Authors:  K Mireskandari; L Garnham; R Sheard; E Ezra; Z J Gregor; J J Sloper
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Focus information is used to interpret binocular images.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The association between anisometropia, amblyopia, and binocularity in the absence of strabismus.

Authors:  D R Weakley
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1999

4.  Contrast gain-control in stereo depth and cyclopean contrast perception.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Chang-Bing Huang; Ju Liang; Yifeng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Preoperative aniseikonia is a prognostic factor for postoperative stereopsis in patients with unilateral epiretinal membrane.

Authors:  Fumiki Okamoto; Shohei Morikawa; Yoshimi Sugiura; Sujin Hoshi; Takahiro Hiraoka; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  The effect of induced monocular blur on measures of stereoacuity.

Authors:  Naomi V Odell; Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Wendy E Adams; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 1.220

7.  Stereopsis after successful surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Authors:  Hiroki Watanabe; Fumiki Okamoto; Yoshimi Sugiura; Sujin Hoshi; Yoshifumi Okamoto; Takahiro Hiraoka; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  User-centered virtual environment design for virtual rehabilitation.

Authors:  Cali M Fidopiastis; Albert A Rizzo; Jannick P Rolland
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Anisometropia magnitude and visual deficits in previously untreated anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Bin-Bin Chen; Feng-Wei Song; Zhao-Hui Sun; Yi Yang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  Binocular combination in anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Chang-Bing Huang; Jiawei Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Lixia Feng; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.