Literature DB >> 14628794

[Scoring systems in the intensive care unit].

K Lewandowski1, M Lewandowski.   

Abstract

Scoring systems represent classification systems or point systems which have been designed for making quantitative statements regarding the severity of a disease, its prognosis, and its course. Furthermore, scores may serve the purposes of assessing therapies, of quality control and of quality assurance, and of an economic evaluation of intensive care. Like all measuring methods, scores are susceptible to failures and systematic mistakes. The clinical user should be well aware of these limitations. Generally, one would recommend only using scores which have been rigorously tested for their reliability, validity, and practicability. These include, but are not limited to, the updated versions of the APACHE, the SAPS, and the MPM. Although great strides have been made concerning development, verification, and clinical applicability, scores still exhibit a level of uncertainty which precludes their use in individual patients. Frequently, it may be of benefit to combine the more general scores with one or several organ dysfunction scores to determine the extent of functional impairment of specific organs. If, however, well-trained medical personnel apply tried and tested scoring systems, intensive care units will definitely gain a lot from it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14628794     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-003-0550-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  34 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence applications in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  C W Hanson; B E Marshall
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Mortality predicted by APACHE II. The effect of changes in physiological values and post-ICU hospital mortality.

Authors:  D R Goldhill; P S Withington
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  An expanded definition of the adult respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  J F Murray; M A Matthay; J M Luce; M R Flick
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1988-09

4.  Therapeutic intervention scoring system: a method for quantitative comparison of patient care.

Authors:  D J Cullen; J M Civetta; B A Briggs; L C Ferrara
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1974 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 5.  Report of the American-European consensus conference on ARDS: definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes and clinical trial coordination. The Consensus Committee.

Authors:  G R Bernard; A Artigas; K L Brigham; J Carlet; K Falke; L Hudson; M Lamy; J R LeGall; A Morris; R Spragg
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System: update 1983.

Authors:  A R Keene; D J Cullen
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Mortality among patients admitted to hospitals on weekends as compared with weekdays.

Authors:  C M Bell; D A Redelmeier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-08-30       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system.

Authors:  W A Knaus; J E Zimmerman; D P Wagner; E A Draper; D E Lawrence
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 9.  Multiple organ failure. Pathophysiology and potential future therapy.

Authors:  E A Deitch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Mortality probability models for patients in the intensive care unit for 48 or 72 hours: a prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  S Lemeshow; J Klar; D Teres; J S Avrunin; S H Gehlbach; J Rapoport; M Rué
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  2 in total

1.  Gender-related outcome difference is related to course of sepsis on mixed ICUs: a prospective, observational clinical study.

Authors:  Irit Nachtigall; Sascha Tafelski; Andreas Rothbart; Lutz Kaufner; Maren Schmidt; Andrey Tamarkin; Maxim Kartachov; Daniela Zebedies; Tanja Trefzer; Klaus-Dieter Wernecke; Claudia Spies
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  Better prognostic marker in ICU - APACHE II, SOFA or SAP II!

Authors:  Iftikhar Haider Naqvi; Khalid Mahmood; Syed Ziaullaha; Syed Mohammad Kashif; Asim Sharif
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.