Literature DB >> 3998742

Visual evoked potentials to lateralised stimuli in two cases of callosal agenesis.

M D Rugg, A D Milner, C R Lines.   

Abstract

Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to lateralised light flashes were recorded from two acallosal patients. In one patient, these recordings were made while he performed a choice-reaction time task, and in the other patient the VEPs were obtained during a simple reaction time task. In both cases the patient's VEPs from electrode sites contralateral to the visual field of stimulus delivery resembled those of controls. Their VEPs from ipsilateral sites were aberrant, however, in that while control subjects showed a smaller and slightly delayed ipsilateral N160 component, this was not discernible in the patients' data. It is concluded that the ipsilateral N160 relies for its generation on the transcallosal transfer of information processed initially by the contralateral hemisphere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3998742      PMCID: PMC1028304          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.48.4.367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  9 in total

1.  A paradox in the lateralisation of the visual evoked response.

Authors:  G Barett; L Blumhardt; A M Halliday; E Halliday; A Kriss
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-05-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Further studies of crossed and uncrossed pathway responding in callosal agenesis--reply to Kinsbourne and Fisher.

Authors:  D M Reynolds; M A Jeeves
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Nasotemporal overlap investigated in a case of agenesis of the corpus callosum.

Authors:  C R Lines
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Neuropsychological studies of callosal agenesis.

Authors:  D Milner
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 7.723

5.  The effect of stimulus intensity on visual evoked potential estimates of interhemispheric transmission time.

Authors:  C R Lines; M D Rugg; A D Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Vocal and manual reaction time estimates of interhemispheric transmission time.

Authors:  T R Bashore
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Simple reaction times to lateralized visual stimuli in a case of callosal agenesis.

Authors:  A D Milner
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Interhemispheric pathways in simple reaction time to lateralized light flash.

Authors:  A D Milner; C R Lines
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Visual evoked potentials to lateralized visual stimuli and the measurement of interhemispheric transmission time.

Authors:  M D Rugg; C R Lines; A D Milner
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.139

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Both sides get the point: hemispheric sensitivities to sentential constraint.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier; Heinke Mai; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-07

Review 2.  Estimation of interhemispheric dynamics from simple unimanual reaction time to extrafoveal stimuli.

Authors:  C M Braun
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  An electrophysiological investigation of interhemispheric transfer time in children and adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Ann Clawson; Peter E Clayson; Mikle South; Erin D Bigler; Michael J Larson
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-02

4.  Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  C Van Petten; M Kutas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-07

5.  Reaching to ipsilateral or contralateral targets: within-hemisphere visuomotor processing cannot explain hemispatial differences in motor control.

Authors:  D P Carey; E L Hargreaves; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Metabolic levels in the corpus callosum and their structural and behavioral correlates after moderate to severe pediatric TBI.

Authors:  Talin Babikian; Sarah Deboard Marion; Sarah Copeland; Jeffry R Alger; Joseph O'Neill; Fabienne Cazalis; Richard Mink; Christopher C Giza; Jennifer A Vu; Suzanne M Hilleary; Claudia L Kernan; Nina Newman; Robert F Asarnow
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Trouble crossing the bridge: altered interhemispheric communication of emotional images in anxiety.

Authors:  Rebecca J Compton; Joshua Carp; Laura Chaddock; Stephanie L Fineman; Lorna C Quandt; Jeffrey B Ratliff
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2008-10

8.  Callosal Function in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Linked to Disrupted White Matter Integrity.

Authors:  Emily L Dennis; Monica U Ellis; Sarah D Marion; Yan Jin; Lisa Moran; Alexander Olsen; Claudia Kernan; Talin Babikian; Richard Mink; Christopher Babbitt; Jeffrey Johnson; Christopher C Giza; Paul M Thompson; Robert F Asarnow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Interhemispheric vs. stimulus-response spatial compatibility effects in bimanual reaction times to lateralized visual stimuli.

Authors:  Antonello Pellicano; Valeria Barna; Roberto Nicoletti; Sandro Rubichi; Carlo A Marzi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-19

10.  Electrophysiological Study of Visual Pathways in Nevoid Basal Cell Carcinoma Syndrome Patients.

Authors:  Antonietta Moramarco; Ludovico Alisi; Alessandro Lambiase; Sandra Giustini; Luca Lucchino; Emanuele Miraglia; Vincenzo Roberti; Marcella Nebbioso
Journal:  Eye Brain       Date:  2021-03-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.